Suppr超能文献

射频消融联合手术切除与保乳术治疗早期乳腺癌的随机Ⅱ期临床试验。

Radiofrequency Ablation Followed by Surgical Excision versus Lumpectomy for Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial.

机构信息

From the Departments of Gynecology (A.G.T., N.C., A.A., M.J.P., E.F.M., J.P.), Pathology (T.S., A.P., C.G.C.), and Radiology (A.G., A.V.), Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, Bellvitge Hospital, Ave Feixa Llarga sn, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08970 Barcelona, Spain; Department of Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncología, Barcelona, Spain (C.F., S.P.); and Department of Surgery, Parc de Salut-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain (F.B.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):317-324. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180235. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

Abstract

Purpose To compare the safety and efficacy of US-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a local treatment for breast cancer with that of lumpectomy. Materials and Methods A prospective, randomized open-label phase II clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov identification number NCT02281812) was conducted in a single institution from 2013 to 2017. Women with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast measuring 2 cm or smaller were randomly assigned to receive RFA or lumpectomy alone (control group). Margin status at surgery, tumor cell viability after RFA (with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide [NADH] and cytokeratin 18 [CK18] staining), cosmetic results, adverse events, and local recurrences were evaluated with univariable and multivariable analyses. Results Forty subjects (20 in the RFA group and 20 in the lumpectomy group) were evaluated. The mean participant age was 64 years (range, 46-86 years). NADH and CK18 staining demonstrated absence of tumor cell viability after RFA with at least one of the two techniques. The surgical margins were positive in 11 of the 20 participants in the lumpectomy group (55%) and four of the 20 in the RFA group (20%) (P = .02). Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 1-83 months). Local breast inflammation after surgery was higher in the RFA group than in the lumpectomy group (40% [eight of 20 participants] vs 5% [one of 20 participants], respectively; P = .01). Local infection occurred in three participants who underwent RFA (two of whom had undergone partial irradiation of the breast). None of the participants in the control group developed local infection. No participants had recurrence or the need for a second surgery during the study period. Conclusion This preliminary study showed that radiofrequency ablation was effective for local tumor control and that tumor-free margins were obtained more often with radiofrequency ablation than with lumpectomy. Surgical excision after radiofrequency ablation was infrequently associated with local infection. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

摘要

目的 比较超声引导下经皮射频消融(RFA)作为局部治疗乳腺癌与肿块切除术的安全性和疗效。

材料与方法 本研究为单中心前瞻性、随机、开放标签的 II 期临床试验(clinicaltrials.gov 注册号:NCT02281812),于 2013 年至 2017 年进行。将 2cm 或更小的乳腺浸润性导管癌患者随机分为单独接受 RFA 或肿块切除术(对照组)。采用单变量和多变量分析评估手术时的切缘状态、RFA 后肿瘤细胞活力(用烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸[NADH]和细胞角蛋白 18[CK18]染色)、美容效果、不良事件和局部复发情况。

结果 40 例患者(RFA 组 20 例,肿块切除术组 20 例)接受了评估。患者的平均年龄为 64 岁(范围,46-86 岁)。NADH 和 CK18 染色显示,两种技术中的至少一种方法均可证实 RFA 后肿瘤细胞活力丧失。肿块切除术组的 20 例患者中有 11 例(55%)和 RFA 组的 20 例患者中有 4 例(20%)的切缘阳性(P =.02)。中位随访时间为 25 个月(范围,1-83 个月)。RFA 组术后乳房局部炎症发生率高于肿块切除术组(40%[20 例患者中的 8 例]比 5%[20 例患者中的 1 例];P =.01)。3 例接受 RFA 的患者发生局部感染(其中 2 例接受了乳房部分放疗)。对照组的患者均未发生局部感染。在研究期间,无患者复发或需要再次手术。

结论 本初步研究显示,RFA 对局部肿瘤控制有效,且与肿块切除术相比,RFA 更常获得无肿瘤切缘。RFA 后手术切除很少与局部感染相关。

©2018RSNA,在线补充材料可供本文参考。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验