• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巨大儿孕妇引产与计划性剖宫产的成本效益分析

Induction of Labor versus Scheduled Cesarean in Morbidly Obese Women: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2019 Mar;36(4):399-405. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668591. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1668591
PMID:30130822
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the costs, complication rates, and harm-benefit tradeoffs of induction of labor (IOL) compared to scheduled cesarean delivery (CD) in women with class III obesity.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cost analysis of IOL versus scheduled CD in nulliparous morbidly obese women. Primary outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI), chorioamnionitis, venous thromboembolism, blood transfusion, and readmission. Model outcomes were mean cost of each strategy, cost per complication avoided, and complication tradeoffs. We assessed the costs, complication rates, and harm-benefit tradeoffs of IOL compared with scheduled CD in women with class III obesity.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients underwent scheduled CD and 114 underwent IOL, of whom 61 (54%) delivered via cesarean. The group delivering vaginally experienced fewer complications. SSI occurred in 0% in the vaginal delivery group, 13% following scheduled cesarean, and 16% following induction then cesarean. In the decision model, the mean cost of induction was $13,349 compared with $14,575 for scheduled CD. Scheduled CD costs $9,699 per case of chorioamnionitis avoided, resulted in 18 cases of chorioamnionitis avoided per additional SSI and 3 cases of chorioamnionitis avoided per additional hospital readmission. In sensitivity analysis, IOL is cost saving compared with scheduled CD unless the cesarean rate following induction exceeds 70%.

CONCLUSION

In morbidly obese women, induction of labor remains cost-saving until the rate of cesarean following induction exceeds 70%.

摘要

目的

评估与计划性剖宫产相比,肥胖程度为 III 级的妇女行引产(IOL)的成本、并发症发生率和利弊权衡。

研究设计

我们对初产妇病态肥胖妇女行 IOL 与计划性 CD 的成本进行了分析。主要结局为手术部位感染(SSI)、绒毛膜羊膜炎、静脉血栓栓塞、输血和再入院。模型结局为每种策略的平均成本、每避免一种并发症的成本以及并发症的权衡。我们评估了肥胖程度为 III 级的妇女行 IOL 与计划性 CD 的成本、并发症发生率和利弊权衡。

结果

共有 110 名患者行计划性 CD,114 名患者行 IOL,其中 61 名(54%)行剖宫产分娩。阴道分娩组并发症较少。SSI 在阴道分娩组中发生率为 0%,计划性剖宫产组为 13%,引产加剖宫产组为 16%。在决策模型中,引产的平均成本为 13349 美元,而计划性 CD 的成本为 14575 美元。每避免 1 例绒毛膜羊膜炎的成本为 9699 美元,每增加 1 例 SSI 可避免 18 例绒毛膜羊膜炎,每增加 1 例再入院可避免 3 例绒毛膜羊膜炎。在敏感性分析中,除非引产加剖宫产的剖宫产率超过 70%,否则 IOL 与计划性 CD 相比具有成本效益。

结论

在病态肥胖妇女中,与计划性 CD 相比,IOL 一直具有成本效益,除非引产加剖宫产的剖宫产率超过 70%。

相似文献

1
Induction of Labor versus Scheduled Cesarean in Morbidly Obese Women: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.巨大儿孕妇引产与计划性剖宫产的成本效益分析
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Mar;36(4):399-405. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668591. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
2
Planned cesarean delivery compared to induction of labor in women with class III obesity: a cost-minimization analysis (.).III级肥胖女性计划剖宫产与引产的成本最小化分析(.)
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Oct;29(19):3084-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1119113. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
3
Economic Analysis of Induction versus Elective Cesarean in Term Nulliparas with Supermorbid Obesity.足月病态肥胖初产妇引产与选择性剖宫产的经济学分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2878-e2885. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776352. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.39 孕周引产与期待治疗对低危初产妇的成本效益分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):590.e1-590.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.病态肥胖女性的非医学指征引产与剖宫产风险增加无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
The cost-effectiveness of ertapenem for the treatment of chorioamnionitis after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后绒毛膜羊膜炎治疗中厄他培南的成本效果分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Dec;33(24):4096-4101. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1597042. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.相对于体重指数的初次剖宫产指征。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):515.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.023. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
Induction of labor at 39 weeks and risk of cesarean delivery among obese women: a retrospective propensity score matched study.39 周引产与肥胖女性剖宫产风险的相关性:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
J Perinat Med. 2021 Feb 25;49(7):791-796. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0043. Print 2021 Sep 27.
9
Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.宫颈条件不佳的肥胖未产妇剖宫产风险:足月时择期引产与期待治疗对比
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):53.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
10
Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery.肥胖症产妇及有剖宫产史产妇的引产或再次剖宫产试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):125-33. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31.

引用本文的文献

1
Induction of Labor: A Narrative Review on Cost Efficiency in Maternity Care.引产:关于产科护理成本效益的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 12;16(10):e71302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71302. eCollection 2024 Oct.