• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰胃癌手术中心化前后的总生存情况。

Overall survival before and after centralization of gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2018 Dec;105(13):1807-1815. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10931. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.10931
PMID:30132789
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Centralization of surgery has been shown to improve outcomes for oesophageal and pancreatic cancer, and has been implemented for gastric cancer since 2012 in the Netherlands. This study evaluated the impact of centralizing gastric cancer surgery on outcomes for all patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma in the intervals 2009-2011 and 2013-2015 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Clinicopathological data, treatment characteristics and mortality were assessed for the periods before (2009-2011) and after (2013-2015) centralization. Cox regression analyses were used to assess differences in overall survival between these intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 7204 patients were included. Resection rates increased slightly from 37·6 per cent before to 39·6 per cent after centralization (P = 0·023). Before centralization, 50·1 per cent of surgically treated patients underwent gastrectomy in hospitals that performed fewer than ten procedures annually, compared with 9·2 per cent after centralization. Patients who had gastrectomy in the second interval were younger and more often underwent total gastrectomy (29·3 per cent before versus 41·2 per cent after centralization). Thirty-day postoperative mortality rates dropped from 6·5 to 4·1 per cent (P = 0·004), and 90-day mortality rates decreased from 10·6 to 7·2 per cent (P = 0·002). Two-year overall survival rates increased from 55·4 to 58·5 per cent among patients who had gastrectomy (P = 0·031) and from 27·1 to 29·6 per cent for all patients (P = 0·003). Improvements remained after adjustment for case mix; however, adjustment for hospital volume attenuated this association for surgically treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Centralization of gastric cancer surgery was associated with reduced postoperative mortality and improved survival.

摘要

背景

手术集中化已被证明可以改善食管癌和胰腺癌的治疗效果,自 2012 年以来,荷兰已经对胃癌实施了手术集中化。本研究评估了将胃癌手术集中化对所有胃癌患者的治疗效果的影响。

方法

从荷兰癌症登记处选择了 2009-2011 年和 2013-2015 年期间被诊断为非贲门胃腺癌的患者。评估了集中化前后(2009-2011 年和 2013-2015 年)的临床病理数据、治疗特征和死亡率。使用 Cox 回归分析评估了这两个时间段之间总生存率的差异。

结果

共纳入 7204 例患者。集中化后,切除率从 37.6%略有增加到 39.6%(P=0.023)。在集中化之前,接受手术治疗的患者中,有 50.1%在每年手术量少于 10 例的医院进行胃切除术,而集中化后这一比例为 9.2%。在第二个时间段接受胃切除术的患者年龄更小,更常接受全胃切除术(集中化前为 29.3%,集中化后为 41.2%)。术后 30 天死亡率从 6.5%降至 4.1%(P=0.004),90 天死亡率从 10.6%降至 7.2%(P=0.002)。接受胃切除术的患者的两年总生存率从 55.4%提高到 58.5%(P=0.031),所有患者的两年总生存率从 27.1%提高到 29.6%(P=0.003)。在调整病例组合后,这些改善仍然存在;然而,对医院容量的调整减弱了这种关联在接受手术治疗的患者中。

结论

胃癌手术的集中化与术后死亡率降低和生存率提高有关。

相似文献

1
Overall survival before and after centralization of gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands.荷兰胃癌手术中心化前后的总生存情况。
Br J Surg. 2018 Dec;105(13):1807-1815. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10931. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
Impact of Centralizing Gastric Cancer Surgery on Treatment, Morbidity, and Mortality.集中胃癌手术对治疗、发病率和死亡率的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec;21(12):2000-2008. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3531-x. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
3
Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.欧洲各地食管癌和胃癌手术结果的差异。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):83-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8966. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
4
Influence of hospital type on outcomes after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.医院类型对食管癌和胃癌手术后结局的影响。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):954-63. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8787. Epub 2012 May 9.
5
International benchmarking in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.国际食管癌和胃癌手术基准比较。
BJS Open. 2018 Oct 19;3(1):62-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50107. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization.通过集中化改善胰腺癌患者的预后。
Br J Surg. 2011 Oct;98(10):1455-62. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7581. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival.胰腺癌手术集中化对切除率和生存率的影响。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jul;101(8):1000-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9468. Epub 2014 May 20.
8
The influence of a composite hospital volume on outcomes for gastric cancer surgery: A Dutch population-based study.综合医院手术量对胃癌手术结局的影响:一项基于荷兰人群的研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 May;115(6):738-745. doi: 10.1002/jso.24562. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.1989 年至 2009 年荷兰医院容量对食管和胃癌手术后术后死亡率和生存率的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(7):1004-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.064. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
Impact of age and co-morbidity on surgical resection rate and survival in patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer.年龄和合并症对食管和胃癌患者手术切除率和生存率的影响。
Br J Surg. 2012 Dec;99(12):1693-700. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8952.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of minimum volume standards in hospitals (MIVOS): a systematic review.医院最小容量标准的影响:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2025 May 6;15(5):e090152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090152.
2
Current status of postoperative morbidity following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a prospective single-center observational study.细胞减灭术联合热灌注化疗治疗伴有腹膜转移的结直肠癌术后并发症的现状:一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jan;108(1):12-19. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.1.12. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER ACCORDING TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY UNIT: ANALYSIS OF 33,774 PATIENTS OVER TWO DECADES.
根据医院肿瘤科室的复杂程度对胃癌进行治疗:对二十年间33774例患者的分析
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Dec 16;37:e1846. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400052e1846. eCollection 2024.
4
D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: Advancements and Technical Considerations.胃癌的D2淋巴结清扫术:进展与技术考量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2129-2140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16545-6. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
5
Adherence to Guidelines for Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment for Gastric Cancer in Italy According to the View of Surgeons and Patients.从外科医生和患者的角度看意大利胃癌诊断、分期及治疗指南的依从性
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 20;13(14):4240. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144240.
6
Micronutrient deficiencies and anemia in the follow-up after gastroesophageal cancer surgery.胃食管癌症手术后的微量营养素缺乏和贫血。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Oct 28;37(11). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae053.
7
Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastro-Esophageal or Gastric Cancer: Anthracyclin Triplets versus FLOT.胃食管癌或胃癌的围手术期化疗:蒽环类三联疗法与FLOT方案对比
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 26;16(7):1291. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071291.
8
Multimodal Therapy Versus Primary Surgery for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Diffuse Type Carcinoma, with a Focus on Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Study.多模态治疗与原发性手术治疗胃及胃食管交界处弥漫型癌,重点为印戒细胞癌:一项全国性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1760-1772. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14690-y. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
9
Association Between Historical Redlining and Access to High-Volume Hospitals Among Patients Undergoing Complex Cancer Surgery in California.加利福尼亚州接受复杂癌症手术的患者中,历史上的红线政策与获得高容量医院之间的关联。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1477-1487. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14679-7. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
10
The Need for Centralization for Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Surgery: A Cohort Study from the GTE-Endocan-RENATEN Network, the CentralChirSINET Study.小肠类癌手术的中心化需求:来自 GTE-Endocan-RENATEN 网络、中央 ChirSINET 研究的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8528-8541. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14276-8. Epub 2023 Oct 9.