Centre de Recherche en Neuropsychologie et Cognition (CERNEC), Université de Montréal, Canada.
Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Neuroscience. 2018 Oct 15;390:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
Blind individuals display superior sensory abilities in other modalities, yet results remain contradictory regarding their performance on olfactory tasks. Using complex ecological olfactory tasks, we evaluated the impact of blindness on olfactory performance. We tested 12 early-blind individuals (M = 49, SD = 13.09) and 12 sighted controls (M = 49, SD = 14.31) who were all blindfolded. Based solely on the wine odors, participants evaluated 24 pairs of wine and determined if both samples belonged to the same category (red wine, white wine, or rosé wine) or not (odor categorization), and if so, whether they were identical or not (odor differentiation). Then, they had to classify 15 different wines (5 red, 5 white and 5 rosé) into red, white, and rosé wines (odor classification). Blind individuals (d': M = 1.3, SD = 1.2) presented lower scores compared to sighted controls (M = 2.2 SD = 0.8; p < .05) in the odor categorization task, but no group difference was observed for the other tasks. For all participants, red wine odors were the easiest to classify (1.8 ± 1.0), followed by white wine odors (0.5 ± 0.6) and finally rosé wine odors (blind and sighted; F[2; 44] = 11.9, p < .001). In summary, early-blind individuals had a harder time to categorize wine odors. This could be explained by a different construction of internal reference categories for wine in early-blind individuals. Finally, this research is in line with the notion of the absence of higher olfactory sensitivity in blind individuals.
盲人在其他感觉模式中表现出卓越的感知能力,但他们在嗅觉任务上的表现结果仍然存在矛盾。我们使用复杂的生态嗅觉任务来评估失明对嗅觉表现的影响。我们测试了 12 名早期失明者(M=49,SD=13.09)和 12 名视力正常的对照组(M=49,SD=14.31),他们都被蒙住了眼睛。仅根据葡萄酒的气味,参与者评估了 24 对葡萄酒,并确定两个样本是否属于同一类别(红葡萄酒、白葡萄酒或桃红葡萄酒),如果是,它们是否相同(气味区分)。然后,他们必须将 15 种不同的葡萄酒(5 种红葡萄酒、5 种白葡萄酒和 5 种桃红葡萄酒)分为红葡萄酒、白葡萄酒和桃红葡萄酒(气味分类)。与视力正常的对照组(M=2.2,SD=0.8;p<0.05)相比,失明者(d':M=1.3,SD=1.2)在气味分类任务中的得分较低,但在其他任务中没有观察到组间差异。对于所有参与者,红葡萄酒的气味最容易分类(1.8±1.0),其次是白葡萄酒的气味(0.5±0.6),最后是桃红葡萄酒的气味(盲人和视力正常者;F[2;44]=11.9,p<0.001)。总之,早期失明者更难对葡萄酒的气味进行分类。这可能是由于早期失明者对葡萄酒的内部参考类别有不同的构建。最后,这项研究符合盲人嗅觉灵敏度较高的观点。