Hamal Mukesh, de Cock Buning Tjard, De Brouwere Vincent, Bardají Azucena, Dieleman Marjolein
Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences (VU University), De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
ISGlobal, Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3453-7.
Social accountability mechanisms have been highlighted as making a contribution to improving maternal health outcomes and reducing inequities. But there is a lack of evidence on how they contribute to such improvements. This study aims to explore social accountability mechanisms in selected districts of the Indian state of Gujarat in relation to maternal health, the factors they address and how the results of these mechanisms are perceived.
We conducted qualitative research through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with actors of civil society and government health system. Data were analyzed using a framework of social determinants of maternal health in terms of structural and intermediary determinants.
There are social accountability mechanisms in the government and civil society in terms of structure and activities. But those that were perceived to influence maternal health were mainly from civil society, particularly women's groups, community monitoring and a maternal death review. The social accountability mechanisms influenced structural determinants - governance, policy, health beliefs, women's status, and intermediary determinants - social capital, maternal healthcare behavior, and availability, accessibility and the quality of the health service delivery system. These further positively influenced the increased use of maternal health services. The social accountability mechanisms, through the process of information, dialogue and negotiation, particularly empowered women to make collective demands of the health system and brought about changed perceptions of women among actors in the system. It ultimately improved relations between women and the health system in terms of trust and collaboration, and generated appropriate responses from the health system to meeting women's groups' demands.
Social accountability mechanisms in Gujarat were perceived to improve interaction between communities and the health system and contribute to improvements in access to and use of maternal health services. The influence of social accountability appeared to be limited to the local/district level and there was lack of capacity and ownership of the government structures.
社会问责机制已被强调有助于改善孕产妇健康结果并减少不平等现象。但缺乏关于它们如何促成此类改善的证据。本研究旨在探讨印度古吉拉特邦部分地区与孕产妇健康相关的社会问责机制、它们所涉及的因素以及这些机制的结果是如何被认知的。
我们通过与民间社会和政府卫生系统的行为者进行深入访谈和焦点小组讨论开展了定性研究。根据孕产妇健康的社会决定因素框架,从结构和中介决定因素方面对数据进行了分析。
在结构和活动方面,政府和民间社会都存在社会问责机制。但那些被认为对孕产妇健康有影响的主要来自民间社会,特别是妇女团体、社区监督和孕产妇死亡审查。社会问责机制影响了结构决定因素——治理、政策、健康观念、妇女地位,以及中介决定因素——社会资本、孕产妇医疗保健行为,以及卫生服务提供系统的可及性、可得性和质量。这些进一步对增加孕产妇保健服务的使用产生了积极影响。社会问责机制通过信息、对话和谈判过程,特别增强了妇女对卫生系统提出集体要求的能力,并改变了系统行为者对妇女的看法。它最终在信任和协作方面改善了妇女与卫生系统之间的关系,并促使卫生系统做出适当回应以满足妇女团体的需求。
古吉拉特邦的社会问责机制被认为改善了社区与卫生系统之间的互动,并有助于改善孕产妇保健服务的获取和使用。社会问责的影响似乎仅限于地方/地区层面,而且政府机构缺乏能力和自主性。