Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Clinical Hospital.
Cardiovascular Department, Gomez Ulla Military Hospital.
Circ J. 2018 Oct 25;82(11):2880-2886. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0298. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains an important issue. The aim of this study was to assess the value of a new discongruence index, to predict PPM after TAVR.
A total of 185 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR with the Edwards Sapien prosthesis or CoreValve Revalving system were included (Edwards valve, n=119; Core Valve Revalving system, n=66). Discongruence index was calculated pre-procedurally as the ratio of selected transcatheter valve size (mm) to body surface area (cm). PPM was defined as effective orifice area (EOA) ≤0.85 cm/m on transthoracic echocardiography before hospital discharge. Mean age was 82±5 years and 72 patients (38.9%) were men. The overall incidence of post-TAVR PPM was 35.1% (n=65). Discongruence index correlated with post-TAVR indexed EOA (y=0.18+0.057x; P<0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, discongruence index was the only independent predictor of post-TAVR PPM (OR, 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.66; P=0.012), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.70, P=0.003), with an optimal cut-off point of 15.02 (sensitivity, 86.2%; specificity, 72.5%; positive predictive value, 74.3%; negative predictive value, 83.4%).
The new discongruence index may be useful tool to predict PPM after TAVR.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配(PPM)仍然是一个重要问题。本研究旨在评估一种新的不匹配指数在预测 TAVR 后 PPM 的价值。
共纳入 185 例因严重主动脉瓣狭窄而行 TAVR 的患者,其中使用 Edwards Sapien 瓣膜 119 例,CoreValve Revalving 系统 66 例。术前通过选择经导管瓣膜尺寸(mm)与体表面积(cm)的比值计算不匹配指数。TAVR 术后出院前经胸超声心动图检查有效瓣口面积(EOA)≤0.85 cm/m 定义为 PPM。患者平均年龄 82±5 岁,72 例(38.9%)为男性。TAVR 后 PPM 的总体发生率为 35.1%(n=65)。不匹配指数与 TAVR 后指数化 EOA 相关(y=0.18+0.057x;P<0.001)。多变量 logistic 回归分析显示,不匹配指数是 TAVR 后 PPM 的唯一独立预测因子(OR,0.15;95%CI:0.03-0.66;P=0.012),受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.62(95%CI:0.54-0.70,P=0.003),最佳截断点为 15.02(敏感性 86.2%;特异性 72.5%;阳性预测值 74.3%;阴性预测值 83.4%)。
新的不匹配指数可能是预测 TAVR 后 PPM 的有用工具。