Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP) and ACCESS Open Minds (pan-Canadian youth mental health services research network), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;53(10):1005-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1578-y. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
While early access to appropriate care can minimise the sequelae of mental illnesses, little is known about how youths come to access mental healthcare. We therefore conducted a systematic review to synthesise literature on the pathways to care of youths across a range of mental health problems.
Studies were identified through searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, HealthSTAR and CINAHL), supplemented by backward and forward mapping and hand searching. We included studies on the pathways to mental healthcare of individuals aged 11-30 years. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data.
Forty-five studies from 26 countries met eligibility criteria. The majority of these studies were from settings that offered services for the early stages of psychosis, and others included inpatient and outpatient settings targeting wide-ranging mental health problems. Generally, youths' pathways to mental healthcare were complex, involved diverse contacts, and, sometimes, undue treatment delays. Across contexts, family/carers, general practitioners and emergency rooms featured prominently in care pathways. There was little standardization in the measurement of pathways.
Except in psychosis, youths' pathways to mental healthcare remain understudied. Pathways to care research may need to be reconceptualised to account for the often transient and overlapping nature of youth mental health presentations, and the possibility that what constitutes optimal care may vary. Despite these complexities, additional research, using standardized methodology, can yield a greater understanding of the help-seeking behaviours of youths and those acting on their behalf; service responses to help-seeking; and the determinants of pathways. This understanding is critical to inform ongoing initatives to transform youth mental healthcare.
尽管尽早获得适当的治疗可以最大程度地减少精神疾病的后遗症,但对于年轻人如何获得精神保健服务却知之甚少。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述,以综合关于各种心理健康问题的年轻人获得保健服务的途径的文献。
通过对电子数据库(MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase、HealthSTAR 和 CINAHL)进行搜索,结合回溯和前向映射以及手动搜索,确定了研究。我们纳入了年龄在 11-30 岁之间的个体接受精神保健服务途径的研究。两名评审员独立筛选文章并提取数据。
来自 26 个国家的 45 项研究符合入选标准。这些研究大多数来自为早期精神病提供服务的环境,还有一些研究包括针对广泛心理健康问题的住院和门诊环境。通常,年轻人获得精神保健服务的途径复杂,涉及多种接触途径,有时会导致不必要的治疗延迟。在不同的环境中,家庭/照顾者、全科医生和急诊室在保健途径中起着重要作用。在测量途径方面几乎没有标准化。
除了精神病外,年轻人获得精神保健服务的途径仍未得到充分研究。需要重新构想途径研究,以考虑到青少年心理健康表现的往往是短暂和重叠的性质,以及最佳护理的构成可能有所不同。尽管存在这些复杂性,但使用标准化方法进行更多的研究,可以更好地了解年轻人及其代表的寻求帮助的行为、服务对寻求帮助的反应以及途径的决定因素。这种理解对于为转型中的青年精神保健服务提供信息至关重要。