Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):327-332. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
The effects of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations are unknown.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations on different implant abutment backgrounds and to define minimum coping and veneer thicknesses for the backgrounds investigated to achieve a target color.
Thirty zirconia disk specimens with thicknesses of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm and 30 veneering ceramic disk specimens with thicknesses of 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mm were fabricated. Three backgrounds were prepared: titanium alloy, zirconia ceramic, and base metal alloy. The zirconia specimens were placed on the backgrounds, and the veneering ceramic specimens were located on the zirconia specimens. Spectrophotometric measurements were made to determine CIELab values. Color difference (ΔE) values were calculated to measure color differences between the specimens and the A2 VITA classical shade tab. ΔE values were compared with a perceptibility threshold (ΔE=2.6). Repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and 1-sample t test were used to analyze data (α=.05).
Mean ΔE values ranged from 2.0 to 9.8. Coping thickness, veneer thickness, and their combination significantly affected ΔE (P<.001).
To achieve the target color with zirconia-based restorations, regardless of the backgrounds tested, the minimum thickness of zirconia coping should be 0.6 mm, and the minimum thickness of veneering ceramic should be 1.2 mm.
应对策略和贴面厚度对氧化锆基修复体颜色的影响尚不清楚。
本体外研究的目的是评估应对策略和贴面厚度对不同种植体基台背景下氧化锆基修复体颜色的影响,并确定研究背景下实现目标颜色所需的最小应对策略和贴面厚度。
制作了 30 个厚度分别为 0.4、0.6 和 0.8 毫米的氧化锆圆盘试件和 30 个厚度分别为 0.8、1.0 和 1.2 毫米的贴面陶瓷圆盘试件。准备了三种背景:钛合金、氧化锆陶瓷和贱金属合金。将氧化锆试件放置在背景上,将贴面陶瓷试件放置在氧化锆试件上。进行分光光度测量以确定 CIELab 值。计算色差(ΔE)值以测量试件与 A2 VITA 经典比色板之间的颜色差异。将 ΔE 值与可感知阈值(ΔE=2.6)进行比较。使用重复测量方差分析、Bonferroni 检验和 1 样本 t 检验对数据进行分析(α=.05)。
平均 ΔE 值范围为 2.0 至 9.8。应对策略厚度、贴面厚度及其组合对 ΔE 有显著影响(P<.001)。
为了实现氧化锆基修复体的目标颜色,无论测试的背景如何,氧化锆应对策略的最小厚度应为 0.6 毫米,贴面陶瓷的最小厚度应为 1.2 毫米。