• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末补体途径在脓毒症性但不在无菌性肩翻修关节置换术中被激活。

The terminal complement pathway is activated in septic but not in aseptic shoulder revision arthroplasties.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Microbiology, Infection Control and Prevention, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Oct;27(10):1837-1844. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.037
PMID:30139682
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The early diagnosis of suspected periprosthetic low-grade infections in shoulder arthroplasties is important for the outcome of the revision surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate new biomarkers of infection in revision shoulder arthroplasties, taking into account the implant design, patient age, and comorbidities.

METHODS

The study included 33 patients with shoulder arthroplasties undergoing revision surgical procedures. Microbiological diagnostic testing was performed in all cases. C-reactive protein serum levels and white blood cell counts were evaluated, and the periprosthetic tissue was stained immunohistologically for the terminal complement pathway components (C3, C5, and C9) and for CD68 and α-defensin.

RESULTS

Microbiological diagnostic testing detected a periprosthetic infection in 10 reverse shoulder arthroplasties and in 4 anatomic shoulder arthroplasties, while the remaining 19 shoulder arthroplasties were classified as aseptic. We observed more Staphylococcus epidermidis infections in reverse shoulder arthroplasties and more Staphylococcus aureus infections in anatomic shoulder arthroplasties. The revision rate correlated with pre-existing comorbidities and number of previous surgical procedures. The C-reactive protein values and the incidence of specific periprosthetic radiolucent lines were significantly increased in septic revision cases. We found increased staining for all tested complement factors (C3, C5, and C9) but not for α-defensin and CD68 in septic tissue. The most interesting finding was that C9 separated septic from aseptic tissue with a predictive specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 88.89%.

CONCLUSION

We observed a strong correlation between C9 expressions in septic revision tissue. We propose that the terminal complement pathway, especially C9 deposition, may be a potential biomarker to identify septic complications using tissue biopsy specimens.

摘要

背景

早期诊断肩关节炎假体周围低度感染对翻修手术的结果很重要。本研究旨在探讨新的感染生物标志物在肩关节炎翻修术中,考虑到植入物设计、患者年龄和合并症。

方法

该研究纳入了 33 例接受肩关节炎翻修手术的患者。所有病例均进行了微生物学诊断检测。评估了 C-反应蛋白血清水平和白细胞计数,并对假体周围组织进行了末端补体途径成分(C3、C5 和 C9)和 CD68 和α-防御素的免疫组织化学染色。

结果

微生物学诊断检测在 10 例反向肩关节炎和 4 例解剖肩关节炎中发现假体周围感染,而其余 19 例肩关节炎被归类为无菌。我们观察到反向肩关节炎中更多的表皮葡萄球菌感染和解剖肩关节炎中更多的金黄色葡萄球菌感染。翻修率与既往合并症和既往手术次数有关。在感染性翻修病例中,C-反应蛋白值和特定假体周围透光线的发生率显著增加。我们发现所有检测的补体因子(C3、C5 和 C9)在感染组织中的染色均增加,但α-防御素和 CD68 染色未增加。最有趣的发现是 C9 可以将感染与非感染组织区分开来,特异性为 100%,敏感性为 88.89%。

结论

我们观察到感染性翻修组织中 C9 表达之间存在很强的相关性。我们提出末端补体途径,特别是 C9 沉积,可能是通过组织活检标本识别感染性并发症的潜在生物标志物。

相似文献

1
The terminal complement pathway is activated in septic but not in aseptic shoulder revision arthroplasties.终末补体途径在脓毒症性但不在无菌性肩翻修关节置换术中被激活。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Oct;27(10):1837-1844. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
2
What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Alpha-Defensin and Leukocyte Esterase Test in Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection?α-防御素和白细胞酯酶检测在人工肩关节感染中的诊断准确性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1712-1718. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000762.
3
C9 immunostaining as a tissue biomarker for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis.C9 免疫染色作为假体周围关节感染诊断的组织生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1112188. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1112188. eCollection 2023.
4
Neer Award 2015: Analysis of cytokine profiles in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the shoulder.2015年尼尔奖:细胞因子谱分析在肩部人工关节周围感染诊断中的应用
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Feb;26(2):186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
5
Is D-dimer a Reliable Serum Marker for Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection?D-二聚体作为血清标志物用于诊断人工肩关节置换术后感染的可靠性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1447-1454. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001774.
6
Qualitative α-defensin test (Synovasure) for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in revision total joint arthroplasty.用于翻修全关节置换术中假体周围感染诊断的定性α-防御素检测(Synovasure)
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1):66-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0295.R1.
7
The Diagnosis of Infection in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties.金属对金属髋关节置换术中感染的诊断
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2569-2573. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.064. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
[Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Shoulder Arthroplasties].[肩关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的诊断]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2017 Dec;155(6):655-660. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112247. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
The challenge of Propionibacterium acnes and revision shoulder arthroplasty: a review of current diagnostic options.痤疮丙酸杆菌与翻修肩关节置换术的挑战:当前诊断方法综述
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):1034-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
10
Improved diagnostic accuracy with the classification tree method for diagnosing low-grade periprosthetic joint infections by quantitative measurement of synovial fluid alpha-defensin and C-reactive protein.分类树方法提高了对低级别假体周围关节感染的诊断准确性,通过对关节液α-防御素和 C 反应蛋白的定量测量。
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):31-38. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04338-6. Epub 2019 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
C9 immunostaining as a tissue biomarker for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis.C9 免疫染色作为假体周围关节感染诊断的组织生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1112188. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1112188. eCollection 2023.
2
Diagnosing a periprosthetic shoulder infection: A systematic review.诊断人工肩关节周围感染:一项系统评价。
J Orthop. 2021 Jul 13;26:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.07.012. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.