Holdsworth Laura M, Gage Heather, Williams Peter, Butler Claire
1Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, MSOB, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
2Surrey Health Economics Centre, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH UK.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Aug 18;4:141. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0332-2. eCollection 2018.
Measuring service use and costs is an important aspect of service delivery evaluation. In end-of-life care, there is heavy reliance on care by family/friends (informal carers) and this should be reflected in the total cost of care alongside formal services. The Ambulatory and Home Care Record, developed in Canada, is both comprehensive in coverage and validated for collecting data on formal and informal caring. This study aimed to adapt and pilot the Ambulatory and Home Care Record questionnaire for use in the UK within a study evaluating a new palliative care service. The objectives were to test if family carers could be recruited and assess acceptability and usability of data gathered.
Single cohort pilot study using a structured telephone questionnaire carried out every other week. Family carers of patients newly added to the palliative care register or referred to hospice services in the South East of England were invited to participate by mail. Volunteers remained in the study for a maximum of six interviews or until the patient died.
In total, 194 carers were invited by mail to participate in the study, of which 23 (11.8%) completed at least one interview and 16 (8.2%) completed all possible interviews. Recruitment to the study was lower than anticipated, but most participants seemed to find the interviews acceptable. The modified questionnaire produced usable and relevant data for an economic evaluation of formal and informal caring costs.
Modifications are needed to the process of recruitment as a postal recruitment strategy did not have a high response rate. The Ambulatory and Home Care Record has proved a viable tool for use in the UK setting, with a few minor modifications, and will be used in a larger study comparing hospice models.
衡量服务使用情况和成本是服务提供评估的一个重要方面。在临终关怀中,严重依赖家人/朋友(非正式护理人员)提供的护理,这应反映在与正规服务一起的护理总成本中。在加拿大开发的门诊和家庭护理记录,覆盖范围全面,且经过验证可用于收集正规和非正规护理的数据。本研究旨在对门诊和家庭护理记录问卷进行改编并在英国进行试点,用于一项评估新的姑息治疗服务的研究中。目标是测试是否能够招募到家庭护理人员,并评估所收集数据的可接受性和可用性。
采用每隔一周进行一次的结构化电话问卷进行单队列试点研究。通过邮件邀请新加入姑息治疗登记册或被转诊至英格兰东南部临终关怀服务机构的患者的家庭护理人员参与。志愿者最多参与六次访谈,或直至患者去世。
总共通过邮件邀请了194名护理人员参与研究,其中23名(11.8%)完成了至少一次访谈,16名(8.2%)完成了所有可能的访谈。研究招募人数低于预期,但大多数参与者似乎认为访谈是可接受的。经过修改的问卷为正规和非正规护理成本的经济评估提供了可用且相关的数据。
由于邮寄招募策略的回应率不高,需要对招募过程进行改进。门诊和家庭护理记录已证明在英国环境中经过一些小的修改后是一种可行的工具,并将用于一项比较临终关怀模式的更大规模研究中。