• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后阿片类药物处方干预措施的系统评价。

Interventions for Postsurgical Opioid Prescribing: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):948-954. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2730.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2730
PMID:30140931
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Over the past 20 years, opioid misuse and opioid addiction have risen to epidemic proportions in the United States. One-third of adults receiving long-term opioid therapy report that their first opioid prescription came from a surgeon, indicating that postsurgical prescribing is an important point of intervention in the opioid epidemic. Such interventions differ from historical interventions on prescribing in that they must be closely monitored to ensure pain continues to be adequately controlled after surgical procedures. As evidence on nonopioid-based pain control grows, a key question is how to implement practice change in postsurgical discharge prescribing.

OBJECTIVE

To examine interventions associated with changing opioid prescription practices on surgical discharge.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Studies published after 2000 that included interventions that aimed at postsurgical opiate stewardship and evaluated outcomes were included. PubMed and Embase were searched through March 2018 for relevant articles, with additional articles retrieved based on citations in articles retrieved in the initial search. Quality was assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies, and quality scores were reconciled through discussion and mutual agreement.

FINDINGS

Eight studies met inclusion criteria, of which 3 were preintervention and postintervention comparison studies, 3 were controlled clinical studies, 1 was a time-series study, and 1 compared postintervention results with a predetermined baseline. Interventions done at the organization level, including changes to electronic health records order sets and workflow, showed clear positive results. Additionally, 2 studies that centered on developing guidelines based on actual patient opioid use and disseminating these guidelines to clinicians reported reductions up to 53% in the quantity prescribed. No increases in emergency department visits or refill requests were reported in studies measuring these outcomes. However, 1 study focused on reducing the number of children who were prescribed codeine found via check-in telephone calls that 13 of 240 patients (5.4%) had inadequately controlled pain.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The studies reviewed provide evidence that clinician-mediated and organizational-level interventions are powerful tools in creating change in postsurgical opioid prescribing. This summary highlights paucity of high-quality studies that provide clear evidence on the most effective intervention at reducing postoperative opioid prescribing.

摘要

重要性

在过去的 20 年中,美国阿片类药物滥用和成瘾已达到流行的程度。接受长期阿片类药物治疗的成年人中有三分之一报告说,他们的第一份阿片类药物处方来自外科医生,这表明术后处方是阿片类药物流行中的一个重要干预点。这种干预与历史上的处方干预不同,因为它们必须密切监测,以确保手术后疼痛继续得到充分控制。随着非阿片类药物控制疼痛的证据不断增加,一个关键问题是如何在术后出院时实施实践改变。

目的

研究与改变术后阿片类药物处方实践相关的干预措施。

证据回顾

纳入 2000 年后发表的、旨在进行术后阿片类药物管理并评估结果的干预措施相关研究。通过 PubMed 和 Embase 检索 2018 年 3 月前的相关文章,并根据在最初检索中检索到的文章的参考文献进一步检索文章。两名独立评审员使用定量研究质量评估工具评估质量,通过讨论和相互协议解决质量评分。

发现

8 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 3 项为干预前后比较研究,3 项为对照临床试验,1 项为时间序列研究,1 项将干预后的结果与预定基线进行比较。以组织为基础的干预措施,包括电子病历医嘱集和工作流程的改变,显示出明确的积极结果。此外,2 项以实际患者阿片类药物使用为基础制定指南并向临床医生传播这些指南的研究报告称,处方量减少了 53%。在衡量这些结果的研究中,没有报告急诊就诊或药物续开请求增加的情况。然而,1 项研究侧重于减少被处方可待因的儿童数量,通过就诊时的电话检查发现,240 名患者中有 13 名(5.4%)疼痛控制不佳。

结论和相关性

综述中的研究提供了证据,证明临床医生介导和组织层面的干预措施是改变术后阿片类药物处方的有力工具。这一总结突出表明,缺乏高质量的研究提供了明确的证据,说明最有效的干预措施可以减少术后阿片类药物的处方。

相似文献

1
Interventions for Postsurgical Opioid Prescribing: A Systematic Review.术后阿片类药物处方干预措施的系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):948-954. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2730.
2
Prescriber Education Interventions to Optimize Opioid Prescribing in Acute Care: A Systematic Review.优化急性护理中阿片类药物处方的处方教育干预措施:系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E551-E562.
3
Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Prescribing for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评价减少急诊科出院患者阿片类药物处方干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43425.
4
A Systematic Review of Interventions and Programs Targeting Appropriate Prescribing of Opioids.针对阿片类药物合理处方的干预措施和项目的系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2019 May;22(3):229-240.
5
A Systematic Review of Behavioral Interventions to Decrease Opioid Prescribing After Surgery.手术治疗后减少阿片类药物处方的行为干预措施的系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):266-278. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003483.
6
Opioid Stewardship: Rapid Review阿片类药物管理:快速综述
7
Interventions to Reduce Inpatient and Discharge Opioid Prescribing for Postpartum Patients: A Systematic Review.干预措施以减少产后患者的住院和出院阿片类药物处方:系统评价。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Mar;68(2):187-204. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13475. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
8
[Patterns of prescription of opioid analgesics in Hôtel-Dieu de France of Beyrouth].[贝鲁特法国主宫医院阿片类镇痛药的处方模式]
Encephale. 2016 Dec;42(6):511-516. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
9
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
10
Effectiveness of organizational interventions on appropriate opioid prescribing for noncancer pain upon hospital discharge: A systematic review.组织干预措施对出院后非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物合理处方的效果:系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;89(3):982-1002. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15633. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Nonhepatectomy Opioid Reduction Efforts on Posthepatectomy Opioid Prescription: Analysis of 2,005 Patients.非肝切除手术中阿片类药物减量措施对肝切除术后阿片类药物处方的影响:对2005例患者的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Apr 1;240(4):474-487. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001279. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Lumpectomy Patients are at Highest Risk for Opioid Overprescription: A Comparison Between Practice Patterns and OPEN National Guidelines.保乳手术患者阿片类药物过度处方风险最高:实践模式与国家开放指南的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2585-2593. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16823-3. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
3
Pre-emptive paracetamol reduces intra-operative opioid use in patients undergoing day-case oncologic breast surgery.
术前使用对乙酰氨基酚可减少日间肿瘤性乳腺手术患者术中阿片类药物的使用。
EXCLI J. 2024 Feb 29;23:356-363. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6804. eCollection 2024.
4
Successful implementation of a quality improvement bundle to reduce opioid overprescribing following total hip and knee arthroplasty.成功实施质量改进措施包,以减少全髋关节和膝关节置换术后阿片类药物的过度处方。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Dec 26;12(4):e002360. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002360.
5
Opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain: an overview of systematic reviews related to two consensus statements relevant at patient, prescriber, system and public health levels.阿片类药物用于急性术后疼痛的处方:与患者、处方者、系统和公共卫生层面相关的两个共识声明的系统评价概述。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02243-5.
6
Opioid prescribing practices and patient-requested refill patterns following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后阿片类药物的处方实践和患者要求的续药模式。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02708-5. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
7
Four-Corner Arthrodesis versus Proximal Row Carpectomy: Risk Factors and Complications Associated with Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use.四角关节融合术与近排腕骨切除术:与术后长期使用阿片类药物相关的风险因素及并发症
J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Aug 5;14(2):163-169. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715426. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Association Between Default Number of Opioid Doses in Electronic Health Record Systems and Opioid Prescribing to Adolescents and Young Adults Undergoing Tonsillectomy.电子健康记录系统中默认的阿片类药物剂量与接受扁桃体切除术的青少年和年轻成年人的阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2219701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19701.
9
Effects of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative recovery in elderly patients with hip fracture: study protocol for a randomised, parallel controlled, double-blind trial.囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞对老年髋部骨折患者术后恢复的影响:一项随机、平行对照、双盲试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e051321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051321.
10
Perioperative Opioids, the Opioid Crisis, and the Anesthesiologist.围手术期阿片类药物、阿片类药物危机与麻醉医生
Anesthesiology. 2022 Apr 1;136(4):594-608. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004109.