Medical Entomology Group, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia.
Environmental Health Research Group, National School of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Oct;99(4):1003-1005. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0250.
An important component of malaria control programs is the ability to assess the effectiveness of the insecticide in insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) during normal usage. The standard technique to measure insecticidal activity is the World Health Organization (WHO) cone test, which in many circumstances, may be difficult to implement. We have evaluated an alternative technique, the colorimetric field test (CFT) on a group of 24-month-old Permanet 2.0 (Vestergaard-Frandsen, Denmark) nets collected in Colombia. The CFT, which measures surface levels (SL) of deltamethrin is compared with standard high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the WHO cone test. Effective concentrations of deltamethrin for 80% mortality (EC) were determined from the CFT and HPLC results. Distribution of insecticide SL after 24 months of use reveal that sampling of the midsection best represents the condition of the entire net. We conclude that the CFT is a practical alternative to the WHO cone test for assessing ITN efficacy.
疟疾控制项目的一个重要组成部分是能够在正常使用情况下评估杀虫剂在经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)中的效果。衡量杀虫活性的标准技术是世界卫生组织(WHO)锥虫试验,但在许多情况下,该试验可能难以实施。我们评估了另一种技术,即在哥伦比亚收集的一组 24 个月大的 Permanet 2.0(Vestergaard-Frandsen,丹麦)蚊帐上进行的比色现场测试(CFT)。CFT 测量的是氯菊酯的表面水平(SL),并与标准高效液相色谱法(HPLC)和 WHO 锥虫试验进行了比较。根据 CFT 和 HPLC 结果确定了氯菊酯达到 80%死亡率的有效浓度(EC)。使用 24 个月后杀虫剂 SL 的分布表明,对中部进行采样最能代表整个蚊帐的状况。我们得出结论,CFT 是评估 ITN 效果的 WHO 锥虫试验的一种实用替代方法。