Microsurgical Epididymal Cystectomy does not Impact Upon Sperm Count, Motility or Morphology and is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Epididymal Cystic Lesions (ECLs) in Young Men With Fertility Requirements.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microsurgical epididymal cystectomy for the treatment of epididymal cystic lesions in young men with fertility requirements and the impact of this surgery upon sperm quality and epididymal function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the therapeutic outcomes, complications, safety and efficacy of microsurgical epididymal cystectomy and the impact of microsurgery upon sperm parameters. All patients were followed-up 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery to investigate sperm count, motility, morphology, neutral α-glucosidase, improvement of symptoms, recurrence, and complications.

RESULTS

Palpated cyst pain was evident in 32 out of 51 patients. Pathologists identified 29 spermatoceles and 22 epididymal cysts. Mean operation time was 39.27 ± 5.98 minutes, and the mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 2.02 ± 0.35 days. After surgery, scrotal pain disappeared in 80.4% of patients (41/51). A significantly higher rate of pain disappearance was observed in patients with palpated pain than those without palpated pain. Insignificant difference was seen in terms of sperm count, motility, sperm morphology or neutral α-glucosidase between preoperation and postoperation at 1-year follow-up. Sperm count and NGA in patients with an epididymal cystic lesions > 2.5 cm were significantly increased after surgery. The rate of complications was 7.3%. No cyst recurrence was observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical epididymal cystectomy does not impact upon sperm count, motility, morphology, or epididymal function and is a safe and effective surgical modality for young men with fertility requirements. Local palpated pain on the epididymal cyst is recommended as an optional surgical indication.