Gerken Alison R, Eller-Smith Olivia C, Morgan Theodore J
Kansas State University, Division of Biology, Ecological Genomics Institute, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Kansas State University, Division of Biology, Ecological Genomics Institute, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
J Therm Biol. 2018 Aug;76:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
Comparing methodologies that attempt to mimic natural conditions is important when evaluating thermal tolerances of ectotherms, as exposing animals to different artificial thermal regimes may provide conflicting information of an insect's thermal profile. Rapid cold hardening (RCH) occurs in ectotherms and typically increases survivorship to extreme cold exposure through a short, pre-treatment to a non-lethal cold temperature. Here we assess survivorship in a set of genotypes from the Drosophila melanogaster Reference Panel for direct and ramping RCH pre-treatments at cooling rates occurring under more natural conditions (0.1 °C/min and 0.5 °C/min) in combination with a direct and ramped rewarming treatment post cold exposure. We find that all three pre-treatment exposures alone significantly increase survivorship. We find significant correlations in survivorship among treatments across genotypes, suggesting that regardless of the pre-treatment, individuals of a given genotype have an innate level of acclimation. When rewarming is introduced, survivorship significantly decreased relative to pre-treatment alone and correlations of survival between phenotypes were not significant. Our results suggest that rewarming and slow RCH are costly to survival while a quicker RCH may impart physiological benefits more consistently across genotypes.
在评估变温动物的热耐受性时,比较试图模拟自然条件的方法很重要,因为将动物暴露于不同的人工热环境可能会提供关于昆虫热特征的相互矛盾的信息。快速冷驯化(RCH)发生在变温动物中,通常通过对非致死低温进行短暂的预处理来提高对极端寒冷暴露的存活率。在这里,我们评估了一组来自黑腹果蝇参考面板的基因型在更自然条件下(0.1°C/分钟和0.5°C/分钟)的冷却速率下进行直接和逐步RCH预处理,并结合冷暴露后的直接和逐步复温处理后的存活率。我们发现,仅这三种预处理暴露就显著提高了存活率。我们发现不同基因型的处理之间在存活率上存在显著相关性,这表明无论预处理如何,给定基因型的个体都有一个固有的适应水平。当引入复温时,存活率相对于仅预处理时显著降低,并且表型之间的生存相关性不显著。我们的结果表明,复温和缓慢的RCH对生存成本高昂,而更快的RCH可能在不同基因型中更一致地带来生理益处。