Nordic Health Economics, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):816-824. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.038. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
The rapid adoption of robot-assisted laparoscopy in radical prostatectomy has preceded data regarding associated costs. Qualitative evidence regarding cost outcomes is lacking.
This study assessed how costs were affected by robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) compared with open surgery.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cost analysis was based on the dataset of the LAPPRO (Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open) clinical trial, which is a prospective controlled, nonrandomised trial of patients who underwent prostatectomy at 14 centres in Sweden between September 2008 and November 2011. Currently, data are available from a follow-up period of 24 mo.
In the LAPPRO trial, RALP was compared with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
Costs per surgical technique were assessed based on resource variable data from the LAPPRO database. The calculation of average costs was based on mean values; Swedish currency was converted to purchasing power parity US dollar (PPP$). All tests were two-tailed and conducted at α=0.05 significance level.
The cost analysis comprised 2638 men. Based on the LAPPRO trial data, RALP was associated with an increased cost/procedure of PPP$ 3837 (95% confidence interval: 2747-4928) compared with RRP. The result was sensitive to variations in caseload. Main drivers of overall cost were robotic system cost, operation time, length of stay, and sick leave. Limitations of the study include the uneven distribution between RALP and RRP regarding procedures in public/for-profit hospitals and surgeon/centre procedural volume.
Based on the LAPPRO trial data, this study showed that RALP was associated with an increased cost compared with RRP in Swedish health care. There are many factors influencing the costs, making the absolute result dependent on the specific setting. However, by identifying the main cost drivers and/or most influential parameters, the study provides support for informed decisions and predictions.
In this study, we looked at the cost outcome when performing prostatectomies by robot-assisted laparoscopic technique compared with open surgery in Sweden. We found that the robot-assisted procedure was associated with a higher mean cost.
机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的迅速采用先于相关成本的数据。关于成本结果的定性证据是缺乏的。
本研究评估了机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)与开放手术相比如何影响成本。
设计、地点和参与者:成本分析基于 LAPPRO(腹腔镜前列腺切除术机器人开放)临床试验的数据集,这是一项前瞻性对照、非随机的研究,纳入了 2008 年 9 月至 2011 年 11 月在瑞典 14 个中心接受前列腺切除术的患者。目前,可获得 24 个月的随访期数据。
在 LAPPRO 试验中,RALP 与根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)进行了比较。
根据 LAPPRO 数据库中的资源变量数据评估了每种手术技术的成本。平均成本的计算基于平均值;瑞典货币已转换为购买力平价美元(PPP$)。所有检验均为双侧,在 α=0.05 显著性水平上进行。
成本分析包括 2638 名男性。根据 LAPPRO 试验数据,与 RRP 相比,RALP 每例手术的成本增加了 PPP$3837(95%置信区间:2747-4928)。结果对病例量的变化敏感。总成本的主要驱动因素是机器人系统成本、手术时间、住院时间和病假。研究的局限性包括 RALP 和 RRP 之间在公共/营利性医院和外科医生/中心手术量方面的程序分布不均。
基于 LAPPRO 试验数据,本研究表明,在瑞典卫生保健中,与 RRP 相比,RALP 与更高的成本相关。有许多因素影响成本,使得绝对结果取决于特定的环境。然而,通过确定主要的成本驱动因素和/或最具影响力的参数,该研究为做出明智的决策和预测提供了支持。
在这项研究中,我们研究了在瑞典,通过机器人辅助腹腔镜技术与开放手术进行前列腺切除术的成本结果。我们发现,机器人辅助手术的平均成本较高。