Lee Chang Han, Lee Seung Hun, Yoo Jun-Il, Lee Shi-Uk
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, South Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, South Korea.
PM R. 2019 Apr;11(4):363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.08.379. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been suggested as a useful treatment for spasticity in patients with stroke. To date, most studies have used clinical or biomechanical assessments to determine the effects of treatment.
To assess the effect of a single session of ESWT through ultrasonographic assessment on spasticity in patients with chronic stroke.
Randomized controlled trial.
Rehabilitation center.
Eighteen patients with chronic stroke.
Participants were randomly assigned to an ESWT group (n = 9) or control group (n = 9). In the ESWT group, a single session of ESWT was given in the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle of the spastic side at 4 Hz, 2000 shots with intensity of stimulation using energy of 0.1 mJ/mm . Sham stimulation was provided by only making sound without putting the device into contact with the skin in the control group. The clinical trial registration number of this study is KCT0002582.
Participants were evaluated prior to the treatment, 30 minutes, 1 week, and 4 weeks after treatment. Clinical measures included Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), passive range of motion (PROM), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). As the primary outcome measure, the ultrasonographic measures were Achilles tendon length (ATL), muscle fascicle length (MFL), muscle thickness (MT), and pennation angle (PA).
There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for any demographic or baseline measures. At all follow-up evaluations, improvement was shown in MAS as well as changes from baseline of ultrasonographic measures in the ESWT group compared to the control group. In the case of ultrasonographic measures, the difference between the group was greatest at 4 weeks. At follow-up of 4 weeks, between-group difference was 0.66 points (P = .04) on MAS scores, 5.45 points (P = .004) on ATL scores, 4.95 points (P = .002) on MFL scores, 1.83 points (P < .001) on MT scores, and 3.73 points (P < .001) on PA scores.
Some ultrasonographic measures of spasticity as well as MAS were improved after a single session of ESWT. Future studies with larger numbers of subjects compared with other spasticity metrics are necessary to further evaluate the treatment effect of ESWT.
II.
体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)已被认为是治疗中风患者痉挛的一种有效方法。迄今为止,大多数研究都使用临床或生物力学评估来确定治疗效果。
通过超声评估单次体外冲击波疗法对慢性中风患者痉挛的影响。
随机对照试验。
康复中心。
18名慢性中风患者。
参与者被随机分为体外冲击波疗法组(n = 9)或对照组(n = 9)。在体外冲击波疗法组中,在患侧腓肠肌内侧头以4Hz频率进行单次体外冲击波治疗,发射2000次,刺激强度为0.1mJ/mm²能量。对照组仅通过发出声音而不使设备接触皮肤来提供假刺激。本研究的临床试验注册号为KCT0002582。
在治疗前、治疗后30分钟、1周和4周对参与者进行评估。临床指标包括改良Ashworth量表(MAS)、被动关节活动度(PROM)和Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA)。作为主要观察指标,超声指标为跟腱长度(ATL)、肌束长度(MFL)、肌肉厚度(MT)和羽状角(PA)。
两组在任何人口统计学或基线指标上均无显著差异。在所有随访评估中,与对照组相比,体外冲击波疗法组的MAS以及超声指标相对于基线的变化均有改善。就超声指标而言,两组之间的差异在4周时最大。在4周的随访中,两组在MAS评分上的组间差异为0.66分(P = 0.04),ATL评分上为5.45分(P = 0.004),MFL评分上为4.95分(P = 0.002),MT评分上为1.83分(P < 0.001),PA评分上为3.73分(P < 0.001)。
单次体外冲击波疗法后,痉挛的一些超声指标以及MAS均有所改善。需要进行更多受试者的未来研究,并与其他痉挛指标进行比较,以进一步评估体外冲击波疗法的治疗效果。
II级。