• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右丙氧芬退出市场对其他处方镇痛药使用的影响。

Effect of the market withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene on use of other prescribed analgesics.

作者信息

Reset Askild, Skurtveit Svetlana, Furu Kari, Skovlund Eva

机构信息

Medical Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2018 Oct 25;18(4):667-674. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0103.

DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2018-0103
PMID:30145581
Abstract

Background and aims Dextropropoxyphene (DXP) is a synthetic opioid that was prescribed worldwide for mild to moderate pain. It was withdrawn from the European market in 2009. In this study we aim to investigate the effect of the market withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene in Norway on overall use of opioids and other analgesics at an individual level. Methods Data were collected from the nationwide Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). It covers all prescription of drugs from 01 January 2004 from Norwegian pharmacies dispensed to individuals outside institutions. The study period was divided in two 2-year periods from 01 September 2008 to 31 August 2010, and from the market withdrawal of DXP on 01 September 2010 to 31 August 2012. We included every individual that filled at least one prescription of dextropropoxyphene in the first 2-year period in our study population. In this study dextropropoxyphene, codeine and tramadol are defined as "weak opioids", and all other opioids are termed "strong opioids". Results Nine thousand one hundred and seventy-one individuals were included in our study population. Four thousand two hundred and ninety filled a prescription of DXP only once and were classified as "single users", 2,990 were users with prescriptions of up to 200 defined daily doses (DDD) over the first 2-year period, or "sporadic users", and 1,886 were classified high users with over 200 DDDs over a 2-year period. After the market withdrawal 8,392 continued to be prescribed analgesics or benzodiazepines. In the single user group, the proportion of users of weak opioids decreased from 69.5% to 57.6%, whereas the proportion of users of strong opioids was unchanged. Among the sporadic user group, the proportion of users of weak opioids went from 69.7% to 71.0%, the proportion using tramadol from 39.1% to 43.9%, and the users of strong opioids from 25.8% to 31.3%. In the high user group, there was an increase in the number of users of strong opioids from 37.8% to 51.4%. The amount of strong opioids prescribed in the high user group increased from a mean of 262.5 DDD to a mean of 398.3 DDD in the following 2 years. The amount of tramadol increased in all groups and was 3 times as high in the high user group after market withdrawal of DXP. Conclusions Our study showed that the withdrawal of DXP lead to an increase in prescription of other analgesics. The proportion of users increased in all three groups and so did the prescribed amount of other analgesics. Both the proportion of users of other opioids and the amount prescribed increased considerably. However, 1 in 10 earlier users of DXP stopped using prescribed analgesics altogether in the following 2 years. The increase in use among earlier high users of DXP was most striking. Implications This study documents markedly increased prescriptions of other opioids after withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene due to its high risk of serious complications. However, consequences of the increased use of opioids among earlier high users of DXP such as changes in risk of poisonings, accidental deaths and suicides remain to be investigated.

摘要

背景与目的 右丙氧芬(DXP)是一种合成阿片类药物,曾在全球范围内用于治疗轻至中度疼痛。它于2009年退出欧洲市场。在本研究中,我们旨在调查挪威右丙氧芬退市对个体层面阿片类药物和其他镇痛药总体使用情况的影响。方法 数据收集自挪威全国处方数据库(NorPD)。该数据库涵盖了2004年1月1日起挪威药店向机构外个人发放的所有药品处方。研究期分为两个2年时间段,从2008年9月1日至2010年8月31日,以及从2010年9月1日右丙氧芬退市至2012年8月31日。我们将在第一个2年时间段内至少开具过一张右丙氧芬处方的每个人纳入研究人群。在本研究中,右丙氧芬、可待因和曲马多被定义为“弱阿片类药物”,所有其他阿片类药物被称为“强阿片类药物”。结果 我们的研究人群包括9171人。4290人仅开具过一次右丙氧芬处方,被归类为“单次使用者”;2990人在第一个2年时间段内开具的处方剂量高达200限定日剂量(DDD),被归类为“偶尔使用者”;1886人在2年时间段内开具的剂量超过200 DDD,被归类为高剂量使用者。退市后,8392人继续被开具镇痛药或苯二氮䓬类药物。在单次使用者组中,弱阿片类药物使用者的比例从69.5%降至57.6%,而强阿片类药物使用者的比例未变。在偶尔使用者组中,弱阿片类药物使用者的比例从69.7%升至71.0%,使用曲马多的比例从39.1%升至43.9%,强阿片类药物使用者的比例从25.8%升至31.3%。在高剂量使用者组中,强阿片类药物使用者的数量从37.8%增至51.4%。高剂量使用者组中开具的强阿片类药物剂量在接下来的2年里从平均262.5 DDD增至平均398.3 DDD。所有组中曲马多的使用量均增加,在右丙氧芬退市后,高剂量使用者组中的使用量是原来的3倍。结论 我们的研究表明,右丙氧芬退市导致其他镇痛药的处方量增加。所有三组中使用者的比例均增加,其他镇痛药的处方量也增加。其他阿片类药物使用者的比例和处方量均大幅增加。然而,10%的右丙氧芬早期使用者在接下来的2年里完全停止使用处方镇痛药。右丙氧芬早期高剂量使用者中使用量的增加最为显著。意义 本研究记录了由于右丙氧芬存在严重并发症的高风险,其退市后其他阿片类药物的处方量显著增加。然而,右丙氧芬早期高剂量使用者中阿片类药物使用量增加的后果,如中毒风险、意外死亡和自杀风险的变化,仍有待研究。

相似文献

1
Effect of the market withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene on use of other prescribed analgesics.右丙氧芬退出市场对其他处方镇痛药使用的影响。
Scand J Pain. 2018 Oct 25;18(4):667-674. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0103.
2
Use of analgesics in France, following dextropropoxyphene withdrawal.右丙氧芬撤市后法国镇痛药的使用情况
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3058-1.
3
To what extent does a cohort of new users of weak opioids develop persistent or probable problematic opioid use?新使用弱阿片类药物的患者群体中,有多大比例会发展为持续性或可能的阿片类药物问题使用?
Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1555-1561. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.045. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
4
Prescribed opioid analgesic use developments in three Nordic countries, 2006-2017.2006 - 2017年三个北欧国家的处方阿片类镇痛药使用情况发展
Scand J Pain. 2019 Apr 24;19(2):345-353. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0307.
5
[Which analgesic after dextropropoxyphene withdrawal? A survey in a sample of general practitioners in southwest of France].右丙氧芬撤药后用哪种镇痛药?法国西南部全科医生样本调查
Therapie. 2011 Jan-Feb;66(1):25-8. doi: 10.2515/therapie/2011004. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
6
Consequences of dextropropoxyphene market withdrawal in elderly patients with chronic pain.右丙氧芬撤市对慢性疼痛老年患者的影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;70(10):1237-42. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1722-x. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
7
Tramadol use in Norway: A register-based population study.曲马多在挪威的使用:一项基于登记的人群研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):54-61. doi: 10.1002/pds.4626. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
8
Reporting rate of adverse drug reactions to the French pharmacovigilance system with three step 2 analgesic drugs: dextropropoxyphene, tramadol and codeine (in combination with paracetamol).三种二阶梯镇痛药(右丙氧芬、曲马多和可待因[与对乙酰氨基酚合用])上报法国药物警戒系统的不良反应报告率。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Sep;68(3):422-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03472.x.
9
Analgesic switching in chronic users of dextropropoxyphene in France.法国右丙氧芬长期使用者的镇痛药物转换
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Apr;38(2):389-397. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12962. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
10
Correlation between prescription of various dextropropoxyphene preparations and their involvement in fatal poisonings.各种右丙氧芬制剂的处方与其在致命中毒事件中的关联。
Forensic Sci Int. 1999 Jul 26;103(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00079-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Patient Perceptions and Experiences of Paracetamol in France: Infodemiology Study Using Social Media Data Mining.评估法国患者对扑热息痛的认知和体验:使用社交媒体数据挖掘的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e25049. doi: 10.2196/25049.
2
Repeated Administration of Clinical Doses of Tramadol and Tapentadol Causes Hepato- and Nephrotoxic Effects in Wistar Rats.临床剂量曲马多和他喷他多的重复给药对Wistar大鼠产生肝毒性和肾毒性作用。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Jul 10;13(7):149. doi: 10.3390/ph13070149.