a Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies , Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hong Kong , Hong Kong.
b United Christian Hospital , Hong Kong , Hong Kong.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2018 Dec;35(8):403-414. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2018.1510387. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
This study investigated the sublexical route in writing Chinese characters. Using a writing-to-dictation task, we compared neurotypical participants' performance on writing a set of 40 characters with homophones sharing different phonetic radicals and another set of 40 characters with homophones sharing the same phonetic radicals. The first set of stimuli was regarded as both syllable-to-character and syllable-to-radical inconsistent, while the second set of stimuli was considered syllable-to-radical consistent but syllable-to-character inconsistent. The results of the error analysis showed that the control participants demonstrated a greater tendency to make errors with preserved phonetic radicals in the second set of stimuli. Furthermore, we conducted the same task with a Chinese brain-injured patient, WCY, who had mild dyslexia and severe dysgraphia associated with mild impairment to the lexical semantic route as shown by the patient's character writing. The results showed that WCY demonstrated similar error patterns as those of the control participants and a shorter writing time in the second set of stimuli. Altogether, the observations were taken as evidence that supported our claim that a syllable-to-phonetic radical route governs the sublexical route in Chinese character writing.
本研究考察了汉字书写的次词汇通路。我们采用了一种听写书写任务,比较了神经典型参与者在书写 40 个同音同音字(具有不同声符)和另 40 个同音同音字(具有相同声符)的表现。第一组刺激物被认为是音节到字符和音节到声符不一致,而第二组刺激物则被认为是音节到声符一致但音节到字符不一致。错误分析的结果表明,对照组参与者在第二组刺激物中更倾向于出现保留声符的错误。此外,我们对一位患有轻度阅读障碍和严重书写障碍的中国脑损伤患者 WCY 进行了相同的任务,该患者的词汇语义通路存在轻度损伤。结果表明,WCY 表现出与对照组参与者相似的错误模式,并在第二组刺激物中表现出较短的书写时间。总的来说,这些观察结果支持了我们的观点,即音节到声符的通路控制着汉字书写的次词汇通路。