Suppr超能文献

在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中采用无支架策略:在某些临床情况下的一种替代策略?

Stentless strategy in primary PCI setting: An alternative strategy in some clinical scenarios?

作者信息

Dan Kazuhiro, Garcia-Garcia Hector M, Shinoda Akira, Waksman Ron

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC, USA.

Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8S):5-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Abstract

We described a case of successful stentless percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow in the right coronary artery (RCA) with diffuse large thrombus, and an algorithm of PCI strategy for the cases with similar clinical scenarios in the current PCI era. Theoretically, stentless PCI might be superior to PCI using a stent since it may prevent long-term issues of dual antiplatelet therapy, stent fracture, and stent thrombosis. In particular acute coronary syndrome with diffuse large thrombus in the RCA will make multiple stenting necessary which may be associated with worse outcomes due to distal coronary flow disorder. We present a case that illustrates that stentless PCI is successful in this scenario. Further research in this field is warranted.

摘要

我们描述了一例成功的无支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)病例,该患者右冠状动脉(RCA)存在弥漫性大血栓,术后心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流达3级,并阐述了当前PCI时代针对类似临床情况的PCI策略算法。理论上,无支架PCI可能优于使用支架的PCI,因为它可以避免双重抗血小板治疗的长期问题、支架断裂和支架内血栓形成。特别是RCA出现弥漫性大血栓的急性冠状动脉综合征,需要进行多次支架置入,这可能会因冠状动脉远端血流紊乱而导致更差的预后。我们展示了一个病例,说明在这种情况下无支架PCI是成功的。该领域值得进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验