Interdepartmental Services Centre of Veterinary for Human and Animal Health, Department of Health Science, Magna Græcia University, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
Department of Animal Sciences and Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):10206-10219. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14389. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
We assessed effects of overfeeding energy to nonlactating and nonpregnant Holstein cows during a length of time similar to a typical dry period on body lipid storage and the abundance of genes related to insulin signaling, inflammation, and ubiquitination in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in vitro challenged with insulin and recombinant bovine tumor necrosis factor-α. Fourteen cows were randomly assigned to either a high-energy (OVE; net energy for lactation = 1.60 Mcal/kg of dry matter; n = 7) or control (CON; net energy for lactation = 1.30 Mcal/kg of dry matter; n = 7) diet for 6 wk. Immediately after slaughter, liver, kidneys, and mammary gland were separated and weighed. The adipose tissue mass in the omental, mesenteric, and perirenal depots was dissected and weighed. Subcutaneous adipose tissue was collected from the tail-head region and was used as follows: control, bovine insulin (INS) at 1 µmol/L, tumor necrosis factor-α at 5 ng/mL (TNF), and their combination. Despite a lack of difference in final body condition score, OVE cows had greater energy intake and were heavier than CON cows. Furthermore, overfeeding led to greater mass of mesenteric and perirenal adipose, liver, and mammary gland. Overall, SAT incubated with INS had an upregulation of insulin receptor (INSR), interleukin-10 (IL10), small ubiquitin-like modifier 3 (SUMO3), and ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2I (UBC9), whereas TNF upregulated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG), diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2), interleukin-6 (IL6), nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 (NFKB1), small ubiquitin-like modifier 2 (SUMO2), and UBC9. Regardless of in vitro treatment, feeding OVE upregulated PPARG, fatty acid synthase (FASN), and insulin induced gene 1 (INSIG1). Abundance of PPARG was greater in SAT of OVE cows cultured individually with INS and TNF. The interaction between diet and in vitro treatment revealed that sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1) had greater abundance in SAT from the CON group in response to culture with INS, whereas SAT from OVE cows had greater SREBF1 abundance in response to culture with TNF. The mRNA abundance of IL6 and NFKB1 was greater in response to TNF treatment and overall in CON cows. Furthermore, SAT from these cows had greater IL10 abundance when cultured with INS and TNF. Overall, data highlighted that overfeeding energy increases adipose tissue mass in part by stimulating transcription of key genes associated with insulin signaling, adipogenesis, and lipogenesis. Because SAT thickness or mass was not measured, the lack of effect of overfeeding on body condition score limits its use to predict overall body lipid storage. An overt inflammatory response in SAT after a 6-wk period of over-consumption of energy could not be discerned.
我们评估了在类似于典型干奶期的一段时间内,给非泌乳和非妊娠荷斯坦奶牛过量喂食能量对体脂储存的影响,以及胰岛素和重组牛肿瘤坏死因子-α体外刺激下皮下脂肪组织(SAT)中与胰岛素信号、炎症和泛素化相关的基因丰度。14 头奶牛被随机分配到高能(OVE;泌乳净能=1.60 Mcal/kg 干物质;n=7)或对照(CON;泌乳净能=1.30 Mcal/kg 干物质;n=7)饮食组,进行 6 周的喂养。屠宰后立即分离并称重肝脏、肾脏和乳腺。解剖并称重网膜、肠系膜和肾周脂肪组织的质量。从尾头区域采集皮下脂肪组织,并进行以下处理:对照、牛胰岛素(INS)1μmol/L、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF)5ng/mL(TNF)及其组合。尽管最终体况评分没有差异,但 OVE 奶牛的能量摄入更多,体重也比 CON 奶牛重。此外,过量喂食导致肠系膜和肾周脂肪、肝脏和乳腺的质量增加。总的来说,用 INS 孵育的 SAT 上调了胰岛素受体(INSR)、白细胞介素 10(IL10)、小泛素样修饰物 3(SUMO3)和泛素连接酶 E2I(UBC9),而 TNF 上调了过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARG)、二酰基甘油 O-酰基转移酶 2(DGAT2)、白细胞介素 6(IL6)、核因子 kappa B 亚单位 1(NFKB1)、小泛素样修饰物 2(SUMO2)和 UBC9。无论体外处理如何,喂食 OVE 都会上调 PPARG、脂肪酸合成酶(FASN)和胰岛素诱导基因 1(INSIG1)。在单独用 INS 和 TNF 培养的 OVE 奶牛的 SAT 中,PPARG 的丰度更高。饮食和体外处理之间的相互作用表明,甾醇调节元件结合转录因子 1(SREBF1)在对 INS 培养有反应的 CON 组的 SAT 中丰度更高,而 OVE 奶牛的 SAT 对 TNF 培养的 SREBF1 丰度更高。在 TNF 处理和总体上的 CON 奶牛中,白细胞介素 6(IL6)和 NFKB1 的 mRNA 丰度更高。此外,用 INS 和 TNF 培养时,这些奶牛的 SAT 中 IL10 的丰度更高。总的来说,数据表明,过量喂食能量会增加脂肪组织的质量,部分原因是刺激与胰岛素信号、脂肪生成和脂肪生成相关的关键基因的转录。由于没有测量 SAT 厚度或质量,过量喂食对体况评分的影响限制了其对整体体脂储存的预测。在过量摄入能量 6 周后,SAT 中未观察到明显的炎症反应。