An audit of percutaneous drainage for acute necrotic collections and walled off necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is used as a first step in the management of symptomatic fluid collections in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to compare the outcome of patients with acute necrotic collection (ANC) and those with walled-off necrosis (WON), who had undergone PCD as a part of management of AP.

METHODS

Consecutive patients of AP with symptomatic ANC or WON undergoing PCD were evaluated. Primary outcome measures were need for additional surgical necrosectomy and mortality. Secondary outcome measures were need for up-gradation of first PCD, need for additional drain, in-hospital as well as total duration of PCD and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Indications of PCD in 375 patients (258 with ANC and 117 with WON) were suspected infected pancreatic necrosis (n = 214), persistent organ failure (n = 117) and pressure symptoms (n = 44). Need for additional surgical necrosectomy was seen in 14% patients with ANC and in 12% of patients with WON (p = 0.364) and mortality was 19% in patients with ANC as compared to 13.7% in those with WON (p = 0.132). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcome parameters between patients who underwent PCD for ANC or WON. Complications of PCD were comparable between patients with ANC and WON except development of external pancreatic fistula which occurred more often in patients with WON than in those with ANC (24.4% versus 34.2% respectively, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Persistent organ failure in more often an indication of PCD in patients with ANC than in WON and suspected infection is more commonly an indication in WON than in ANC. Early PCD is as efficacious and safe as delayed PCD.