Kidney transplantation in older recipients: Preemptive high KDPI kidney lower KDPI kidney after varying dialysis vintage.

AIM

To evaluate the outcomes of transplanting marginal kidneys preemptively compared to better-quality kidneys after varying dialysis vintage in older recipients.

METHODS

Using OPTN/United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2001-2015, we identified deceased donor kidney (DDK) transplant recipients > 60 years of age who either underwent preemptive transplantation of kidneys with kidney donor profile index (KDPI) ≥ 85% (marginal kidneys) or received kidneys with KDPI of 35%-84% (better quality kidneys that older wait-listed patients would likely receive if waited longer) after being on dialysis for either 1-4 or 4-8 years. Using a multivariate Cox model adjusting for donor, recipient and transplant related factors- overall and death-censored graft failure risks along with patient death risk of preemptive transplant recipients were compared to transplant recipients in the 1-4 and 4-8 year dialysis vintage groups.RESUTLSThe median follow up for the whole group was 37 mo (interquartile range of 57 mo). A total of 6110 DDK transplant recipients above the age of 60 years identified during the study period were found to be eligible to be included in the analysis. Among these patients 350 received preemptive transplantation of kidneys with KDPI ≥ 85. The remaining patients underwent transplantation of better quality kidneys with KDPI 35-84% after being on maintenance dialysis for either 1-4 years ( = 3300) or 4-8 years ( = 2460). Adjusted overall graft failure risk and death-censored graft failure risk in preemptive high KDPI kidney recipients were similar when compared to group that received lower KDPI kidney after being on maintenance dialysis for either 1-4 years (HR 1.01, 95%CI: 0.90-1.14, = 0.84 and HR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.79-1.16, = 0.66 respectively) or 4-8 years (HR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.63-1.07, = 0.15 and HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.52-1.25, = 0.33 respectively). Adjusted patient death risk in preemptive high KDPI kidney recipients were similar when compared to groups that received lower KDPI kidney after being on maintenance dialysis for 1-4 years (HR 0.99, 95%CI: 0.87-1.12, = 0.89) but lower compared to patients who were on dialysis for 4-8 years (HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.56-0.98, = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

In summary, our study supports accepting a "marginal" quality high KDPI kidney preemptively in older wait-listed patients thus avoiding dialysis exposure.