• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给予社会支持的神经相关因素:有针对性与非针对性支持的差异。

Neural Correlates of Giving Social Support: Differences Between Giving Targeted Versus Untargeted Support.

机构信息

From the Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2018 Oct;80(8):724-732. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000623.

DOI:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000623
PMID:30148747
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Giving support contributes to the link between social ties and health; however, the neural mechanisms are not known. Giving support in humans may rely on neural regions implicated in parental care in animals. The current studies, therefore, assess the contribution of parental care-related neural regions to giving support in humans and, as a further theoretical test, examine whether the benefits of giving targeted support to single, identifiable individuals in need extend to giving untargeted support to larger societal causes.

METHODS

For study 1 (n = 45, M (SD) age = 21.98 (3.29), 69% females), participants completed a giving support task, followed by an emotional faces task in the functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner. For study 2 (n = 382, M (SD) age = 43.03 (7.28), 52% females), participants self-reported on their giving support behavior and completed an emotional faces task in the functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner.

RESULTS

In study 1, giving targeted (versus untargeted) support resulted in greater feelings of social connection and support effectiveness. Furthermore, greater septal area activity, a region centrally involved in parental care in animals, to giving targeted support was associated with less right amygdala activity to an emotional faces task (r = -.297, 95% confidence interval = -.547 to -.043). Study 2 replicated and extended this association to show that self-reports of giving targeted support were associated with less amygdala activity to a different emotional faces task, even when adjusting for other social factors (r = -.105, 95% confidence interval = -.200 to -.011). Giving untargeted support was not related to amygdala activity in either study.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the unique benefits of giving targeted support and elucidate neural pathways by which giving support may lead to health.

摘要

目的

给予支持有助于建立社会关系与健康之间的联系;然而,其神经机制尚不清楚。人类给予支持可能依赖于动物中与亲代照料相关的神经区域。因此,本研究评估了与亲代照料相关的神经区域对人类给予支持的贡献,并作为进一步的理论检验,研究了将支持有针对性地给予单个有需要的可识别个体的益处是否扩展到对更大的社会事业的无针对性支持。

方法

在研究 1(n=45,M(SD)年龄=21.98(3.29),69%为女性)中,参与者完成了一项给予支持任务,随后在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中完成了一项情绪面孔任务。在研究 2(n=382,M(SD)年龄=43.03(7.28),52%为女性)中,参与者自我报告了他们的给予支持行为,并在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中完成了一项情绪面孔任务。

结果

在研究 1 中,给予有针对性的(而非无针对性的)支持会产生更强的社会联系感和支持效果。此外,中隔区(动物亲代照料中核心参与的区域)活动增加与对情绪面孔任务的右杏仁核活动减少呈正相关(r=-.297,95%置信区间=-.547 至 -.043)。研究 2 复制并扩展了这一关联,表明即使在考虑其他社会因素的情况下,自我报告的有针对性的支持与对不同的情绪面孔任务的杏仁核活动减少相关(r=-.105,95%置信区间=-.200 至 -.011)。在这两项研究中,给予无针对性的支持都与杏仁核活动无关。

结论

研究结果突出了给予有针对性支持的独特益处,并阐明了支持可能促进健康的神经途径。

相似文献

1
Neural Correlates of Giving Social Support: Differences Between Giving Targeted Versus Untargeted Support.给予社会支持的神经相关因素:有针对性与非针对性支持的差异。
Psychosom Med. 2018 Oct;80(8):724-732. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000623.
2
Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces.杏仁核对真实面孔而非计算机生成面孔的直接注视有反应。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 1;204:116216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116216. Epub 2019 Sep 22.
3
Task-Related Functional Connectivity Analysis of Emotion Discrimination in a Family Study of Schizophrenia.任务相关的功能连接分析在精神分裂症家系研究中的情绪辨别。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Oct 21;43(6):1348-1362. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx004.
4
Neural correlates of giving support to a loved one.支持所爱之人的神经相关因素。
Psychosom Med. 2012 Jan;74(1):3-7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182359335. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
5
Dynamic Changes in Amygdala Psychophysiological Connectivity Reveal Distinct Neural Networks for Facial Expressions of Basic Emotions.杏仁核心理生理连通性的动态变化揭示了基本情绪面部表情的不同神经通路。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:45260. doi: 10.1038/srep45260.
6
Neural bases of social feedback processing and self-other distinction in late childhood: The role of attachment and age.社交反馈处理和自我与他人区分的神经基础在儿童晚期:依恋和年龄的作用。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jun;20(3):503-520. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00781-w.
7
Unsmoothed functional MRI of the human amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis during processing of emotional faces.处理情绪面孔时人类杏仁核和终纹床核的未平滑功能磁共振成像。
Neuroimage. 2018 Mar;168:383-391. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
Brain activation in response to overt and covert fear and happy faces in women with borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍女性对显性和隐性恐惧及快乐面孔的大脑激活情况。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Jun;10(2):319-31. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9406-4.
9
Neural mechanisms of affective matching across faces and scenes.跨面孔和场景的情感匹配的神经机制。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):1492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37163-9.
10
Experimental manipulation of infant temperament affects amygdala functional connectivity.对婴儿气质的实验性操控会影响杏仁核功能连接。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug;17(4):858-868. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0518-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of self-identity on social anxiety among college students: a moderated mediation model.自我认同对大学生社交焦虑的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 30;16:1622431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1622431. eCollection 2025.
2
Giving support to close others increases affective risk perceptions: longitudinal and experimental studies.支持亲密他人会增加情感风险感知:纵向研究与实验研究
J Behav Med. 2025 Jun;48(3):488-499. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00552-3. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
3
Provision of social support and mental health in U.S. military veterans.
美国退伍军人的社会支持与心理健康
Npj Ment Health Res. 2022 Jun 29;1(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s44184-022-00004-9.
4
How Impulsivity is Associated with Adolescent Depression: The Role of Substance Use, Gender and Social Support.冲动性如何与青少年抑郁症相关联:物质使用、性别和社会支持的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Dec 7;16:4959-4970. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S429923. eCollection 2023.
5
Caring animals and the ways we wrong them.关爱动物以及我们伤害它们的方式。
Biol Philos. 2023;38(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s10539-023-09913-1. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
6
Understanding the benefits of extrinsic emotion regulation in depression.了解外在情绪调节在抑郁症中的益处。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1120653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120653. eCollection 2023.
7
Support-Giving Is Associated With Lower Systemic Inflammation.支持给予与较低的系统炎症相关。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 May 23;57(6):499-507. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac059.
8
Praying for People You Know Predicts Survival over 17 Years Among People Living with HIV in the U.S.为你认识的人祈祷可预测美国 HIV 感染者 17 年以上的存活率
J Relig Health. 2022 Oct;61(5):4081-4095. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01622-5. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
9
The Resting Brain Sets Support-Giving in Motion: Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Momentary Rest Primes Supportive Responding.静息大脑启动给予支持的行为:瞬间休息期间背内侧前额叶皮层的活动引发支持性反应。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020 Nov 2;1(1):tgaa081. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa081. eCollection 2020.
10
Individual differences in resting-state connectivity and giving social support: implications for health.静息态连接性与给予社会支持的个体差异:对健康的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Nov 10;15(10):1076-1085. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz052.