Dizman Nazli, Adashek Jacob J, Hsu JoAnn, Bergerot Paulo G, Bergerot Cristiane D, Pal Sumanta K
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Western University of Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Pomona, California.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2018 Aug;16(8):555-563.
In parallel with advances in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), multiple adjuvant treatments have been tested for RCC. Adjuvant approaches now extend beyond conventional immunotherapies, such as interferon alfa and interleukins, to targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Most treatment approaches before the targeted treatment era did not improve patient outcomes, or study results were mixed. For example, a recent study found that disease-free survival was longer with sunitinib than with placebo in high-risk clear cell RCC, which led to the regulatory approval of sunitinib. However, another large study of adjuvant sunitinib in a slightly different patient population did not confirm these results. Ongoing studies of targeted treatments and immune checkpoint inhibitors may clarify the effectiveness of these agents in the near future. This review presents a comprehensive, chronologic examination of studies addressing adjuvant treatment in RCC, focusing on the key differences between similar approaches. It also discusses the future of adjuvant treatment in RCC.
随着转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)治疗方法的进展,人们对RCC的多种辅助治疗方法进行了测试。辅助治疗方法现已从传统免疫疗法(如干扰素α和白细胞介素)扩展到靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂。在靶向治疗时代之前,大多数治疗方法并未改善患者预后,或者研究结果喜忧参半。例如,最近一项研究发现,在高危透明细胞RCC中,舒尼替尼治疗的无病生存期比安慰剂更长,这使得舒尼替尼获得了监管批准。然而,另一项针对稍有不同患者群体的舒尼替尼辅助治疗大型研究并未证实这些结果。正在进行的靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂研究可能会在不久的将来阐明这些药物的有效性。本综述对涉及RCC辅助治疗的研究进行了全面、按时间顺序的考察,重点关注相似方法之间的关键差异。它还讨论了RCC辅助治疗的未来。