Cleveland Clinic, Medicine Institute, Center for Value-based Care Research, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland Clinic, Medicine Institute, Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):783-786. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3064. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
When cardiac stress testing is ordered prior to noncardiac surgery, the optimal test modality is unknown. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in a representative sample of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery without an existing diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The predicted accuracy of DSE was greater than that of SPECT in around 60.5% of cases above the current guideline-recommended risk threshold. In this population, DSE is likely to be more accurate than SPECT in the diagnosis of obstructive CAD. To the extent that making a diagnosis of obstructive CAD changes the decision to pursue noncardiac surgery, DSE likely represents a more efficient testing modality. However, in the range of pretest probabilities among this population, positive results from either test are more likely to represent false positives than true positives.
当心脏压力测试在非心脏手术前被要求时,最佳的测试方式是未知的。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以比较多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在一个没有冠心病(CAD)现有诊断的代表性非心脏手术患者样本中的诊断准确性。在当前指南推荐的风险阈值以上,DSE 的预测准确性在大约 60.5%的病例中大于 SPECT。在这个人群中,DSE 可能比 SPECT 更准确地诊断阻塞性 CAD。在某种程度上,诊断为阻塞性 CAD 会改变是否进行非心脏手术的决策,DSE 可能代表一种更有效的测试方式。然而,在这个人群的术前概率范围内,两种测试的阳性结果更有可能是假阳性而不是真阳性。