Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Technique: A Comparative Study of Percutaneous versus Surgical Insertion.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is a standard renal replacement therapy, but there is a lack of consensus for catheter insertion method and type of catheter used. We retrospectively analyzed 140 peritoneal dialysis catheters (PDC) inserted in 139 CAPD patients by two methods; percutaneous (Group "P," = 47) and surgical mini laparotomy (Group "S," = 93) technique over a 39-month period, with cumulative experience of 2415 catheter-months: 745 catheter-months for Group "P" and 1670 catheter-months for Group "S." Break-in period was shorter in Group "P" ( = 0.002) whereas primary nonfunction rate was comparable ( = 0.9). The mean catheter survival was better in Group "S" (17.95 ± 10.96 months vs. 15.85 ± 9.41 months in "P" group, = 0.05) whereas the death-censored and overall catheter survival was comparable in both groups. PDC removal due to refractory peritonitis was also comparable. Mechanical complications were more in "P" group ( = 0.049), leading to higher catheter removal ( = 0.033). The peritonitis rates were higher in "P" group (1 episode per 24.8 catheter-months vs. 1 episode per 34.8 catheter-months in "S" group, = 0.026) and related to a higher number of rural patients in the group ( = 0.04). Patient survival was comparable. There was no effect on episodes of peritonitis in those CAPD patients who had diabetic etiology or prior hemodialysis catheter-related sepsis, age, and PDC insertion method.