Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助供体肾切除术应用吻合器的初步经验。

Initial Experience with the Use of a Robotic Stapler for Robot-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1054-1057. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0461. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Since the first description of robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for living donor renal transplantation, additional studies have noted outcomes comparable to traditional laparoscopic surgery. Urologists have embraced the technical advantages of the robotic approach, including improved dissection and more accurate graft preservation. With the advent of robotic stapling, we aim to demonstrate the feasibility of the use of robotic stapling for living-donor nephrectomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten cases of da Vinci EndoWrist Stapler use during robot-assisted donor nephrectomy by a single surgeon are reported. Variables examined included patient anatomy, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), postoperative complications, and graft function at follow-up. The costs of the laparoscopic and robotic staplers at our institution are reported.

RESULTS

One right and nine left nephrectomies were performed by a single surgeon. Eight living donors had a single renal artery and vein, while two had multiple renal arteries and renal veins. A single vascular stapler load (45-mm, white cartridge) was used for vessels in all cases. WIT was <6 minutes in each case, and EBL ranged from 13 to 100 mL. Sufficient length on the renal artery and vein was obtained to execute anastomoses in all cases. Only one patient had postoperative complications that were related to anesthesia. Graft function of recipients and postoperative renal function has been adequate to date. The cost of using the robotic stapler was $705 (EndoWrist Stapler), and the cost of the laparoscopic stapler (Endo GIA™ Stapler; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was $494.06.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of robotic stapler is feasible in terms of patient safety, technique, postoperative outcomes, and cost in both left- and right-sided living-donor robotic nephrectomies. Further research is needed to confirm the benefit and safety of EndoWrist stapler use in robotic donor nephrectomies compared to laparoscopic stapler use.

摘要

介绍

自首例机器人辅助腹腔镜供体肾切除术用于活体供肾移植以来,其他研究也指出其结果可与传统腹腔镜手术相媲美。泌尿科医生已经接受了机器人手术的技术优势,包括改善解剖和更准确地保存移植物。随着机器人吻合器的出现,我们旨在证明机器人吻合器在活体供肾切取术中的可行性。

材料与方法

报告了由一名外科医生完成的 10 例达芬奇 EndoWrist 吻合器在机器人辅助供体肾切除术中的使用情况。检查的变量包括患者解剖结构、估计失血量(EBL)、热缺血时间(WIT)、术后并发症以及随访时的移植物功能。报告了我们机构腹腔镜和机器人吻合器的成本。

结果

由一名外科医生完成了 1 例右侧和 9 例左侧肾切除术。8 位活体供者有 1 条肾动静脉,2 位有 2 条以上的肾动静脉和肾静脉。所有病例均使用单根血管吻合器(45mm,白色卡匣)。每个病例的 WIT 均<6 分钟,EBL 范围为 13-100ml。所有病例均获得足够的肾动静脉长度以进行吻合。只有 1 位患者发生与麻醉相关的术后并发症。受者移植物功能和术后肾功能至今均充足。使用机器人吻合器的成本为 705 美元(EndoWrist Stapler),腹腔镜吻合器(Endo GIA™吻合器;Medtronic,都柏林,爱尔兰)的成本为 494.06 美元。

结论

从患者安全、技术、术后结果和成本的角度来看,机器人吻合器在左右侧活体供体机器人肾切除术均可行。需要进一步研究来证实与腹腔镜吻合器相比,EndoWrist 吻合器在机器人供肾切取术中的安全性和益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验