1 Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04401, Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):1068-1074. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18817. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
The objectives of this study were to determine the diagnostic yield of percutaneous biopsy of osseous spinal lesions under CT and fluoroscopy guidance and to analyze lesion-related and technical factors affecting higher diagnostic yield.
We retrospectively reviewed 247 consecutive percutaneous spinal biopsies and recorded the following information: size, anatomic location, and bone matrix of lesions; guiding modality; years of attending physicians' experience; number of approaches; pathologic result of initial biopsy; and final diagnosis. The pathologic results of the initial biopsies were classified as diagnostic or nondiagnostic. All variables were compared using Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Multivariate logistic regression was also conducted.
Of the initial 247 biopsies, 197 (80%) biopsies were diagnostic. On multivariate analysis, size, bone matrix, and final diagnosis of lesion were significant factors affecting biopsy yield. Biopsies of large lesions (≥ 20 mm) showed higher diagnostic yield than biopsies of small lesions (p = 0.006). Biopsies of lytic lesions had the highest diagnostic yield (88%), followed by biopsies of mixed (84%), sclerotic (67%), and isodense lesions (61%). Differences were significant for diagnostic yields of biopsies of lytic versus sclerotic lesions (p = 0.004) and lytic versus isodense lesions (p = 0.031). Biopsies of metastases had significantly highest diagnostic yield (97%), followed by biopsies of primary malignancies (84%) and benign lesions (39%) (p < 0.05).
For percutaneous image-guided biopsies of spinal tumorous lesions, diagnostic yield was 80%. Size, bone matrix, and final diagnosis of lesions affected diagnostic yield of percutaneous image-guided biopsies.
本研究旨在确定 CT 和透视引导下经皮骨脊柱病变活检的诊断率,并分析影响更高诊断率的病变相关和技术因素。
我们回顾性分析了 247 例连续经皮脊柱活检,记录了以下信息:病变的大小、解剖位置和骨基质;引导方式;主治医生经验年限;入路数量;初次活检的病理结果;以及最终诊断。初次活检的病理结果分为诊断性或非诊断性。使用 Pearson 卡方检验或 Fisher 确切检验比较所有变量。还进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。
在最初的 247 例活检中,197 例(80%)活检为诊断性。多变量分析显示,病变的大小、骨基质和最终诊断是影响活检率的重要因素。≥ 20mm 的大病变活检的诊断率高于小病变活检(p = 0.006)。溶骨性病变的活检诊断率最高(88%),其次是混合性病变(84%)、硬化性病变(67%)和等密度病变(61%)。溶骨性病变与硬化性病变活检诊断率的差异有统计学意义(p = 0.004),溶骨性病变与等密度病变活检诊断率的差异也有统计学意义(p = 0.031)。转移性病变的活检诊断率最高(97%),其次是原发性恶性肿瘤(84%)和良性病变(39%)(p < 0.05)。
对于脊柱肿瘤性病变的经皮影像引导活检,诊断率为 80%。病变的大小、骨基质和最终诊断影响经皮影像引导活检的诊断率。