Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术中仅在骨水泥固定时使用止血带与长时间使用止血带的比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparison of tourniquet application only during cementation and long-duration tourniquet application in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Cong, Zhou Chenhe, Qu Hao, Yan Shigui, Pan Zhijun

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Aug 30;13(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0927-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tourniquet is widely used by orthopedic surgeons in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are still controversies on the optimal timing of tourniquet application. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effect and safety of tourniquet application only during cementation with long-duration tourniquet application in TKA.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane library, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted in July 2017. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tourniquet application only during cementation with long-duration tourniquet application in TKA were included. RevMan 5.3 software was selected to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 440 TKAs were included for meta-analysis. The results suggested that although significant less intraoperative and total blood loss were observed with long-duration tourniquet application, tourniquet application only during cementation would not increase the number of transfusion and operation time. Tourniquet application only during cementation results in less knee pain on post-operative day 1 (POD 1), less time needed to achieve straight-leg raise, and less minor complications following TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Tourniquet application only during cementation might reduce the rate of minor complications and have faster functional recovery during the early rehabilitation period following TKA, but it could not limit intraoperative and total blood loss. No definitive conclusions can be drawn based on the current evidences. Further, large well-designed RCTs with extensive follow-up are still needed to validate this research.

摘要

背景

在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,止血带被骨科医生广泛使用。然而,关于止血带应用的最佳时机仍存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较在TKA中仅在骨水泥固定时应用止血带与长时间应用止血带的效果和安全性。

方法

2017年7月对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和科学网进行了电子文献检索。纳入了所有比较TKA中仅在骨水泥固定时应用止血带与长时间应用止血带的随机对照试验(RCT)。选择RevMan 5.3软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入7项研究,共440例TKA进行荟萃分析。结果表明,虽然长时间应用止血带术中及总失血量显著减少,但仅在骨水泥固定时应用止血带不会增加输血次数和手术时间。仅在骨水泥固定时应用止血带可使术后第1天(POD 1)膝关节疼痛减轻、达到直腿抬高所需时间缩短,且TKA后轻微并发症减少。

结论

仅在骨水泥固定时应用止血带可能会降低轻微并发症的发生率,并在TKA后的早期康复期间实现更快的功能恢复,但它不能限制术中及总失血量。基于目前的证据无法得出明确结论。此外,仍需要进一步进行设计良好且随访广泛的大型RCT来验证本研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf75/6117889/84d2f86aa75b/13018_2018_927_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验