• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管起搏系统对生活质量的影响。

Health-related quality of life impact of a transcatheter pacing system.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1697-1704. doi: 10.1111/jce.13726. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1111/jce.13726
PMID:30168233
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter pacing systems (TPS) provide a novel, minimally invasive approach in which a miniaturized, leadless pacemaker (PM) is transfemorally implanted in the right ventricle. We evaluated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact, patient satisfaction, and activity restrictions following TPS in a large prospective multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent a Micra TPS implantation between December 2013 and May 2015 were included. HRQoL impact was evaluated using the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire at baseline, 3, and 12 months. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a three-item questionnaire determining recovery, activity level, and esthetic appearance at 3 months. Implanting physicians compared the patient activity restrictions for TPS to traditional PM therapy. A total of 720 patients were implanted with a TPS (76 ± 11 years; 59% male). Of these patients, 702 (98%), 681 (95%), and 635 (88%) completed the SF-36 at baseline, 3 and 12 months, respectively. Improvements were observed at 3 and 12 months in all SF-36 domains and all attained statistical significance. Of 693 patients who completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire, 96%, 91%, 74% were (very) satisfied with their esthetic appearance, recovery, and level of activity, respectively. TPS discharge instructions were rated less restrictive in 49%, equally restrictive in 47%, and more restrictive in 4% of cases compared with traditional PM systems.

CONCLUSIONS

TPS resulted in postimplant HRQoL improvements at 3 and 12 months, and high levels of patient satisfaction at 3 months. Further, TPS was associated with less activity restrictions compared with traditional PM systems.

摘要

背景

经导管起搏系统(TPS)提供了一种新颖的微创方法,通过经股静脉植入微型无导线起搏器(PM)到右心室。我们在一项大型前瞻性多中心临床试验中评估了 TPS 对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响、患者满意度以及对活动限制的影响。

方法和结果

纳入了 2013 年 12 月至 2015 年 5 月期间接受 Micra TPS 植入的患者。使用短式 36 项健康调查简表(SF-36)问卷在基线、3 个月和 12 个月时评估 HRQoL 影响。使用三项问卷在 3 个月时评估患者满意度,确定恢复情况、活动水平和美观度。植入医生将 TPS 患者的活动限制与传统 PM 疗法进行比较。共植入 720 例 TPS(76±11 岁;59%为男性)。其中,702 例(98%)、681 例(95%)和 635 例(88%)分别在基线、3 个月和 12 个月时完成了 SF-36 问卷。在 3 个月和 12 个月时,所有 SF-36 领域均有改善,均具有统计学意义。在完成患者满意度问卷的 693 例患者中,分别有 96%、91%和 74%对美观度、恢复情况和活动水平(非常)满意。与传统 PM 系统相比,TPS 出院医嘱被认为限制较少的占 49%、限制相当的占 47%、限制更多的占 4%。

结论

TPS 在 3 个月和 12 个月时导致植入后 HRQoL 改善,并且在 3 个月时患者满意度高。此外,与传统 PM 系统相比,TPS 与较少的活动限制相关。

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life impact of a transcatheter pacing system.经导管起搏系统对生活质量的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1697-1704. doi: 10.1111/jce.13726. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
2
To retrieve, or not to retrieve: System revisions with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.取还是不取:带有 Micra 经导管起搏器的系统修订版。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):1801-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker.无导线起搏器在血液透析患者中的植入:Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
4
Monocentric experience of leadless pacing with focus on challenging cases for conventional pacemaker.无导线起搏的单中心经验,重点关注传统起搏器的挑战性病例。
Acta Cardiol. 2018 Oct;73(5):459-468. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1410351. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
5
Left femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation: patient characteristics and outcomes.经左侧股静脉入路植入无导线起搏器:患者特征与结局。
Europace. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):1456-1461. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab083.
6
Long-term performance of a transcatheter pacing system: 12-Month results from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.经导管起搏系统的长期性能:来自Micra经导管起搏研究的12个月结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 May;14(5):702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.01.035. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Very high pacing thresholds during long-term follow-up predicted by a combination of implant pacing threshold and impedance in leadless transcatheter pacemakers.在无导线经导管心脏起搏器中,起搏阈值和阻抗的组合预测了长期随访时非常高的起搏阈值。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):868-874. doi: 10.1111/jce.14360. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
8
Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation After Lead Extraction in Patients With Severe Device Infection.严重器械感染患者导线拔除后无导线心脏起搏器植入术
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Sep;27(9):1067-71. doi: 10.1111/jce.13030. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
The rationale and design of the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study: safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized pacemaker.Micra经导管起搏研究的基本原理与设计:新型小型化起搏器的安全性与有效性
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):807-13. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv026. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
10
Predictors of improved quality of life 1 year after pacemaker implantation.心脏起搏器植入术后1年生活质量改善的预测因素。
Am Heart J. 2008 Sep;156(3):491-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless Pacemakers: The "Leading Edge" of Quality of Life in Cardic Electrophysiology.无导线起搏器:心脏电生理学中生活质量的“前沿”。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Mar 31;27(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02228-5.
2
Safety and Performance of the Micra VR Leadless Pacemaker in a South Korean Cohort: A Comparison to Global Studies.韩国队列中Micra VR无导线起搏器的安全性和性能:与全球研究的比较。
Korean Circ J. 2025 Jun;55(6):526-537. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0317. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
3
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography Predicts Future Pacemaker Implantation and Adverse Cardiovascular Events.
人工智能心电图预测未来起搏器植入和不良心血管事件。
J Med Syst. 2024 Jul 19;48(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02088-6.
4
Paradigm Shifts in Cardiac Pacing: Where Have We Been and What Lies Ahead?心脏起搏的范式转变:我们何去何从,未来又将如何?
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2938. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082938.
5
A Rare Case of Persistent Bacteremia: Leadless Micra Pacemaker Endocarditis.持续性菌血症罕见病例:无导线Micra起搏器心内膜炎。
Case Rep Cardiol. 2023 Jan 18;2023:8326020. doi: 10.1155/2023/8326020. eCollection 2023.
6
Brazilian Guidelines for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - 2023.《巴西心脏植入式电子设备指南 - 2023》
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jan 23;120(1):e20220892. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220892.
7
Comparation of quality of life in Chinese patients undergoing leadless versus conventional pacemaker implantation.比较无导线起搏器与传统起搏器植入的中国患者的生活质量。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Jan;46(1):49-56. doi: 10.1002/clc.23939. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Leadless Pacemakers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e019212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019212. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
9
[Cardiac implantable electronic devices and health-related quality of life].[心脏植入式电子设备与健康相关生活质量]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2019 Jun;30(2):160-167. doi: 10.1007/s00399-019-0619-x. Epub 2019 Apr 10.