Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano and Fondazione Luigi Villa, Milan, Italy.
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;16(12):2432-2441. doi: 10.1111/jth.14279. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Essentials Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has a large unknown genetic component. We sequenced coding areas of 734 hemostasis-related genes in 899 DVT patients and 599 controls. Variants in F5, FGA-FGG, CYP4V2-KLKB1-F11, and ABO were associated with DVT risk. Associations in KLKB1 and F5 suggest a more complex genetic architecture than previously thought. SUMMARY: Background Although several genetic risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are known, almost all related to hemostasis, a large genetic component remains unexplained. Objectives To identify novel genetic determinants by using targeted DNA sequencing. Patients/Methods We included 899 DVT patients and 599 controls from three case-control studies (DVT-Milan, Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of risk factors for venous thrombosis [MEGA], and the Thrombophilia, Hypercoagulability and Environmental Risks in Venous Thromboembolism [THE-VTE] study) for sequencing of the coding regions of 734 genes involved in hemostasis or related pathways. We performed single-variant association tests for common variants (minor allele frequency [MAF] ≥ 1%) and gene-based tests for rare variants (MAF ≤ 1%), accounting for multiple testing by use of the false discovery rate (FDR). Results Sixty-two of 3617 common variants were associated with DVT risk (FDR < 0.10). Most of these mapped to F5,ABO,FGA-FGG, and CYP4V2-KLKB1-F11. The lead variant at F5 was rs6672595 (odds ratio [OR] 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.92), in moderate linkage with the known variant rs4524. Reciprocal conditional analyses suggested that intronic variation might drive this association. We also observed a secondary association at the F11 region: missense KLKB1 variant rs3733402 remained associated conditional on known variants rs2039614 and rs2289252 (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.69). Two novel variant associations were observed, in CBS and MASP1, but these were not replicated in the meta-analysis data from the International Network against Thrombosis (INVENT) consortium. There was no support for a burden of rare variants contributing to DVT risk (FDR > 0.2). Conclusions We confirmed associations between DVT and common variants in F5,ABO,FGA-FGG, and CYP4V2-KLKB1-F11, and observed secondary signals in F5 and CYP4V2-KLKB1-F11 that warrant replication and fine-mapping in larger studies.
尽管已经发现了一些深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的遗传风险因素,但几乎所有因素都与止血有关,还有很大一部分遗传因素尚未得到解释。
通过靶向 DNA 测序来确定新的遗传决定因素。
患者/方法:我们纳入了来自三个病例对照研究(DVT-Milan、多环境和遗传评估静脉血栓形成风险因素[MEGA]以及血栓形成、高凝和静脉血栓栓塞的环境风险[THE-VTE]研究)的 899 例 DVT 患者和 599 例对照,对 734 个参与止血或相关途径的基因的编码区进行测序。我们对常见变异(次要等位基因频率 [MAF]≥1%)进行了单变异关联测试,并对罕见变异(MAF≤1%)进行了基于基因的测试,通过假发现率(FDR)对多重检测进行了校正。
在 3617 个常见变异中,有 62 个与 DVT 风险相关(FDR<0.10)。其中大多数变异位于 F5、ABO、FGA-FGG 和 CYP4V2-KLKB1-F11。F5 上的主要变异是 rs6672595(比值比 [OR]1.58,95%置信区间 [CI]1.29-1.92),与已知变异 rs4524 呈中度连锁。相互条件分析表明,内含子变异可能驱动了这种关联。我们还在 F11 区域观察到一个次要关联:错义 KLKB1 变异 rs3733402 在已知变异 rs2039614 和 rs2289252 条件下仍然与 F11 相关(OR1.36,95%CI1.10-1.69)。在 CBS 和 MASP1 中观察到两个新的变异关联,但在国际血栓形成网络(INVENT)联盟的荟萃分析数据中未得到复制。没有证据表明罕见变异的负担会导致 DVT 风险增加(FDR>0.2)。
我们证实了 DVT 与 F5、ABO、FGA-FGG 和 CYP4V2-KLKB1-F11 中的常见变异之间存在关联,并在 F5 和 CYP4V2-KLKB1-F11 中观察到次要信号,这些信号需要在更大的研究中进行复制和精细定位。