Cohen Russell G, Sherman Nathan C, James Sheridan L
Orthopedics. 2018 Nov 1;41(6):e765-e771. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180828-05. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
Cementless fixation design failures led to low use of this alternative technology. A cementless total knee arthroplasty addressed these design flaws. The single radius knee design incorporated additive manufacturing to produce the tibial and patellar implants. Both implants have enhanced porous substrates, optimizing initial bony ingrowth. A nonrandomized prospective review was conducted of 72 cementless knees followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 37 months). Surgical time, estimated blood loss, and range of motion at 6 weeks were compared with those of a matched cohort of 70 cemented knees performed by the same surgeon. Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score were recorded for the cementless group. Radiographs were evaluated for change in implant position, subsidence, and radiolucent and sclerotic lines. Operative time was statistically shorter in the cementless group (40 vs 45 minutes), but there was no significant difference in postoperative estimated blood loss (557 vs 355 mL). Range of motion at 6 weeks averaged 118° in the cementless group vs 114° in the cemented group. Knee Society Score improved from 53.9 preoperatively to 85.0 at 6 weeks and 91.6 at most recent follow-up. Oxford Knee Score improved from 23.9 preoperatively to 31.7 at 6 weeks and 43.4 at most recent follow-up. No implants aseptically loosened or migrated. There were 2 early infections in the cemented group requiring revision. This cementless total knee arthroplasty revealed excellent clinical results at 3-year follow-up and resulted in shortened operative times. Biologic fixation was achieved in 100% of patients with improved functional and objective scores. Early results are encouraging, and this cementless total knee arthroplasty appears to provide an excellent alternative to cemented total knee arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e765-e771.].
非骨水泥固定设计的失败导致这种替代技术的使用率较低。一种非骨水泥全膝关节置换术解决了这些设计缺陷。单半径膝关节设计采用增材制造来生产胫骨和髌骨植入物。两种植入物都有增强的多孔基质,优化了初始骨长入。对72例非骨水泥膝关节进行了非随机前瞻性研究,随访至少2年(平均37个月)。将手术时间、估计失血量和6周时的活动范围与同一外科医生进行的70例骨水泥膝关节匹配队列的相应指标进行比较。记录非骨水泥组的膝关节协会评分和牛津膝关节评分。对X线片进行评估,以观察植入物位置变化、下沉以及透射线和硬化线情况。非骨水泥组的手术时间在统计学上较短(40分钟对45分钟),但术后估计失血量无显著差异(557毫升对355毫升)。非骨水泥组6周时的活动范围平均为118°,骨水泥组为114°。膝关节协会评分从术前的53.9提高到6周时的85.0,最近一次随访时为91.6。牛津膝关节评分从术前的23.9提高到6周时的31.7,最近一次随访时为43.4。没有植入物发生无菌性松动或移位。骨水泥组有2例早期感染需要翻修。这种非骨水泥全膝关节置换术在3年随访时显示出优异的临床结果,且手术时间缩短。100%的患者实现了生物固定,功能和客观评分均有所改善。早期结果令人鼓舞,这种非骨水泥全膝关节置换术似乎为骨水泥全膝关节置换术提供了一个极佳的替代方案。[《骨科》。2018年;41(6):e765 - e771。]