Weber Ann, Darmstadt Gary L, Rao Nirmala
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Nov;1(3):213-224. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30073-1. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Gender differences in child development have been extensively studied in high-income countries, but few data are available from low-income and middle-income countries. Our objective was to assess gender disparities in child development that might arise from differential investment in child health, nutrition, and education in six countries across the east Asia-Pacific region.
In this cross-sectional, population-based study we quantified the magnitude of gender differences in child development using the East Asia-Pacific Early Child Development Scales (EAP-ECDS) in six countries (Cambodia, China, Mongolia, Papua New Guinea, Timor-Leste, and Vanuatu). We used stratified random sampling (according to age, residence [urban vs rural], and sex) in all countries to recruit eligible children aged 3-5 years from non-ethnic minority populations with no identified or suspected special educational needs for whom EAP-ECDS scores for five or more of seven domains and urban-rural residence information were available. Gender differences in development associated with four national indicators of gender equality (sex ratio at birth, Gender Development Index, Gender Inequality Index, and Gender Parity Index for primary school enrolment) were also examined. We used generalised estimating equation regression to study moderation of differences by family socioeconomic status and wealth, and structural equation models with maximum likelihood to test mediation through health, nutrition, and education.
Between June 1, 2013, and Dec 13, 2013, 7582 eligible children were included from Cambodia (n=1189), China (n=1618), Mongolia (n=1230), Papua New Guinea (n=1639), Timor-Leste (n=1176), and Vanuatu (n=730). Girls had significantly higher development scores than boys in Cambodia (difference in composite score: β=1·87 points, 95% CI 0·29 to 3·45; p=0·747), China (2·66 points, 1·20 to 4·13; p=0·0004), Vanuatu (3·10 points, 1·65 to 4·55; p<0·0001), and Mongolia (3·94 points, 2·67 to 5·21; p<0·0001), but not Papua New Guinea (-0·43 points, -1·19 to 0·33; p=0·272) or Timor-Leste (0·09 points, -0·96 to 1·14; p=0·861). Differences in favour of girls were the largest for language skills in Mongolia (5·30 points, 95% CI 4·45 to 6·15); differences in language skills were smallest in the two poorest countries, Timor-Leste (-0·07 points, -1·03 to 0·88) and Papua New Guinea (0·05 points, -1·02 to 1·12). Greater differences in composite scores for girls compared with boys-in favour of girls-were associated with higher national Gender Development Index values (R=0·790). In Mongolia, smaller gender differences in development were associated with increased household wealth (6·07 points [95% CI 3·22 to 8·92] in the lowest wealth quartile vs 2·27 points [1·38 to 3·15] in the highest wealth quartile), whereas in Timor-Leste, girls only outperformed boys when living in households with higher socioeconomic status (2·87 points [0·27 to 5·47] in the highest wealth quartile and 3·74 points [2·17 to 5·31] in the highest quartile of parental socioeconomic status). Mediating pathways explained up to 37% (in Vanuatu) of the association between gender and development, controlling for family socioeconomic status.
Girls aged 3-5 years generally outperformed boys on tests of development, and increasing levels of gender equality across six countries in the east Asia-Pacific region were associated with improved performance of young girls relative to boys. Greater opportunities for economic development are anticipated to result from improvements in gender equality and in the development of girls. Further study is warranted to understand family-level processes and societal norms that lead to gender differences in child development in the early years.
UNICEF, the Asia-Pacific Regional Network for Early Childhood, and the Open Society Foundations.
高收入国家对儿童发育中的性别差异进行了广泛研究,但低收入和中等收入国家的数据较少。我们的目标是评估东亚及太平洋地区六个国家在儿童健康、营养和教育方面的不同投入可能导致的儿童发育中的性别差异。
在这项基于人群的横断面研究中,我们使用东亚及太平洋儿童早期发展量表(EAP - ECDS)对六个国家(柬埔寨、中国、蒙古、巴布亚新几内亚、东帝汶和瓦努阿图)儿童发育中的性别差异程度进行了量化。我们在所有国家采用分层随机抽样(根据年龄、居住地[城市与农村]和性别),从非少数民族、未发现或疑似有特殊教育需求、年龄在3至5岁且能获取七个领域中五个或更多领域的EAP - ECDS分数及城乡居住信息的合格儿童中招募研究对象。我们还研究了与四个国家性别平等指标(出生性别比、性别发展指数、性别不平等指数和小学入学性别均等指数)相关的发育方面的性别差异。我们使用广义估计方程回归来研究家庭社会经济地位和财富对差异的调节作用,并使用最大似然结构方程模型来检验通过健康、营养和教育的中介作用。
在2013年6月1日至2013年12月1日期间,柬埔寨(n = 1189)、中国(n = 1618)、蒙古(n = 1230)、巴布亚新几内亚(n = 1639)、东帝汶(n = 1176)和瓦努阿图(n = 730)共纳入了7582名合格儿童。在柬埔寨(综合得分差异:β = 1.87分,95%CI 0.29至3.45;p = 0.747)、中国(2.66分,1.20至4.13;p = 0.0004)、瓦努阿图(3.10分,1.65至4.55;p < 0.0001)和蒙古(3.94分,2.67至5.21;p < 0.0001),女孩的发育得分显著高于男孩,但在巴布亚新几内亚( - 0.43分, - 1.19至0.33;p = 0.272)和东帝汶(0.09分, - 0.96至1.14;p = 0.861)并非如此。在蒙古,女孩在语言技能方面比男孩的优势最大(5.30分,95%CI 4.45至6.15);在两个最贫穷的国家,东帝汶( - 0. .07分, - 1.03至0.88)和巴布亚新几内亚(0.05分, - 1.02至1.12),语言技能方面的差异最小。与男孩相比,女孩在综合得分上更大的差异(有利于女孩)与更高的国家性别发展指数值相关(R = 0.790)。在蒙古,发育方面较小的性别差异与家庭财富增加有关(最低财富四分位数组为6.07分[95%CI 3.22至8.92],最高财富四分位数组为2.27分[1.38至3.15]),而在东帝汶,只有当女孩生活在社会经济地位较高的家庭中时才比男孩表现更好(最高财富四分位数组为2.87分[0.27至5.47],父母社会经济地位最高四分位数组为3.74分[2.17至5.31])。在控制家庭社会经济地位的情况下,中介途径解释了性别与发育之间关联的37%(在瓦努阿图)。
3至5岁的女孩在发育测试中总体上比男孩表现更好,东亚及太平洋地区六个国家性别平等程度的提高与幼龄女孩相对于男孩表现的改善相关。预计性别平等的改善和女孩的发育将带来更多的经济发展机会。有必要进一步研究导致儿童早期发育中性别差异的家庭层面过程和社会规范。
联合国儿童基金会、亚太地区儿童早期网络和开放社会基金会。