• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗第二代药物洗脱支架后非心脏手术的心脏风险。

Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine.

Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2019 Apr;128(4):621-628. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003408.

DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000003408
PMID:30169404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Noncardiac surgery (NCS) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting is sometimes associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) were developed to decrease the incidence of MACE seen with bare metal and first-generation DES.

METHODS

The medical records of all adult patients who underwent second-generation DES placement between July 29, 2008 and July 28, 2011 followed by NCS between September 22, 2008 and July 1, 2013 were reviewed. All episodes of MACE following surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 282 patients (74.8% male) were identified who underwent NCS after PCI with second-generation DES. MACE occurred in 15 patients (5.3%), including 11 deaths. The incidence of MACE changed significantly with time from PCI to NCS: 17.1%, 10.0%, 0.0%, and 3.1% for patients undergoing NCS at 0-90, 91-180, 181-365, and ≥366 days, respectively. Compared with those having NCS ≥366 days after PCI, the odds ratio for MACE (95% confidence interval) was 6.4 (1.9 to 21.3) at 0-90 days and 3.4 (0.8 to 15.3) at 91-180 days. Seven days prior to NCS, 146 (52%) patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), 106 (38%) were on aspirin, and 30 (11%) did not receive antiplatelet therapy. Excessive surgical bleeding occurred in 19 cases (6.7%). While observed bleeding rates were lowest in those not receiving antiplatelet therapy, there were no statistically significant differences based on the presence or absence of antiplatelet therapy (3% [1/30] for no antiplatelet therapy compared to 6% [6/106] for aspirin monotherapy and 8% [12/146] for DAPT; Fisher exact test: P = .655).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of MACE in patients with second-generation DES undergoing NCS was 5.3% and was highest in the first 180 days following DES implantation. The rate of excessive surgical bleeding was 6.7% with the highest observed rate in those on DAPT. However, differences by the presence or absence of antiplatelet therapy were not significant, and future large observational studies will be necessary to further define bleeding risk with continued DAPT.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后行非心脏手术(NCS)有时会导致主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)的开发旨在降低裸金属和第一代 DES 引起的 MACE 发生率。

方法

回顾了 2008 年 7 月 29 日至 2011 年 7 月 28 日期间接受第二代 DES 置入术并于 2008 年 9 月 22 日至 2013 年 7 月 1 日期间行 NCS 的所有成年患者的病历。记录了手术后所有 MACE 事件。

结果

共确定了 282 例(74.8%为男性)接受第二代 DES 行 PCI 后行 NCS 的患者。15 例(5.3%)患者发生 MACE,包括 11 例死亡。从 PCI 到 NCS 的时间,MACE 的发生率显著变化:0-90 天、91-180 天、181-365 天和≥366 天的患者分别为 17.1%、10.0%、0.0%和 3.1%。与 PCI 后≥366 天行 NCS 的患者相比,0-90 天的 MACE 比值比(95%置信区间)为 6.4(1.9 至 21.3),91-180 天为 3.4(0.8 至 15.3)。NCS 前 7 天,146 例(52%)患者接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT),106 例(38%)患者服用阿司匹林,30 例(11%)未接受抗血小板治疗。19 例(6.7%)患者发生过度手术出血。尽管未接受抗血小板治疗的患者出血率最低,但基于抗血小板治疗的有无,出血率没有统计学意义(无抗血小板治疗组为 3%[1/30],阿司匹林单药组为 6%[6/106],DAPT 组为 8%[12/146];Fisher 确切检验:P=.655)。

结论

接受第二代 DES 行 NCS 的患者 MACE 发生率为 5.3%,DES 植入后 180 天内发生率最高。DAPT 组过度手术出血率最高,为 6.7%。然而,抗血小板治疗的有无对出血率无显著影响,需要进一步进行大样本观察性研究来确定持续 DAPT 的出血风险。

相似文献

1
Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗第二代药物洗脱支架后非心脏手术的心脏风险。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Apr;128(4):621-628. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003408.
2
Timing of noncardiac surgery after coronary artery stenting with bare metal or drug-eluting stents.冠状动脉裸金属支架或药物洗脱支架置入术后非心脏手术的时机选择。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Nov 1;104(9):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.038.
3
Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents prior to noncardiac surgery.非心脏手术前药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;85(4):533-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25617. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
4
Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PARIS)后双联抗血小板治疗停药与心脏事件:前瞻性观察研究的 2 年结果。
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1714-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61720-1. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
5
Cardiac risk of noncardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后非心脏手术的心脏风险
Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):596-604. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318186de1c.
6
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Older Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.老年患者中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):744-751. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Stent Thrombosis in Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.双联抗血小板治疗患者的药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架内血栓形成。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;8(12):1552-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.026.
8
Two-year outcomes after first- or second-generation drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the PRODIGY study (PROlonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY).全患者人群行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后第一代或第二代药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架植入术后 2 年的结果:来自 PRODIGY 研究(支架内内膜增生分级后延长双联抗血小板治疗研究)的预先指定分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Role of stent type and of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Is bare metal stent implantation still a justifiable choice? A post-hoc analysis of the all comer PRODIGY trial.支架类型和双重抗血小板治疗持续时间在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的慢性肾脏病患者中的作用。裸金属支架植入仍然是一个合理的选择吗?全人群PRODIGY试验的事后分析
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;212:110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.033. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
10
Perioperative management of oral antiplatelet therapy and clinical outcomes in coronary stent patients undergoing surgery. Results of a multicentre registry.接受手术的冠状动脉支架植入患者围手术期口服抗血小板治疗的管理及临床结局。一项多中心注册研究的结果
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Feb;113(2):272-82. doi: 10.1160/TH14-05-0436. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
What should be done when appropriate antiplatelet therapy fails to prevent stent thrombosis? Two case reports.当适当的抗血小板治疗未能预防支架内血栓形成时该怎么办?两例病例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Jun 26;11(6):e7625. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7625. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in CAD patients: A comparison of major adverse cardiovascular events of second- and third-generation drug-eluting stents.冠心病患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:第二代与第三代药物洗脱支架主要不良心血管事件的比较
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 16;13:900798. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.900798. eCollection 2022.
3
Association Between Antifibrinolytic Therapy and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Stents Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.
抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗与冠状动脉支架置入术后行非心脏手术患者围手术期结局的关系。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Jun 1;132(6):1635-1644. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005522.
4
Impact of previous percutaneous coronary intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality after lung cancer surgery: A nationwide study in Korea.肺癌手术后既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对心血管结局和死亡率的影响:韩国全国性研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Sep;11(9):2517-2528. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13563. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
5
Anesthetic Agents and Cardiovascular Outcomes of Noncardiac Surgery after Coronary Stent Insertion.冠状动脉支架置入术后非心脏手术的麻醉药物与心血管结局
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 5;9(2):429. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020429.
6
Association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative myocardial injury in patients with prior coronary stents undergoing high-risk surgery: a retrospective study.既往有冠状动脉支架置入史的患者在接受高风险手术时术中低血压与术后心肌损伤之间的关联:一项回顾性研究
J Anesth. 2020 Apr;34(2):257-267. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02736-4. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block combined with general anesthesia for amputation in an acute myocardial infarction patient after percutaneous coronary intervention: A case report.超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞联合全身麻醉用于经皮冠状动脉介入术后急性心肌梗死患者截肢术:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Sep 6;7(17):2567-2572. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i17.2567.