Suppr超能文献

药物涂层球囊治疗小血管病变的疗效(BASKET-SMALL 2):一项开放标签、随机、非劣效性临床试验

Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Knappschaftskrankhenhaus, Klinikum Westfalen, Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):849-856. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31719-7. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are a novel therapeutic strategy for small native coronary artery disease. However, their safety and efficacy is poorly defined in comparison with drug-eluting stents (DES).

METHODS

BASKET-SMALL 2 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial. 758 patients with de-novo lesions (<3 mm in diameter) in coronary vessels and an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive angioplasty with DCB versus implantation of a second-generation DES after successful predilatation via an interactive internet-based response system. Dual antiplatelet therapy was given according to current guidelines. The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of DCB versus DES regarding major adverse cardiac events (MACE; ie, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularisation) after 12 months. The non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 4% in MACE. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01574534.

FINDINGS

Between April 10, 2012, and February 1, 2017, 382 patients were randomly assigned to the DCB group and 376 to DES group. Non-inferiority of DCB versus DES was shown because the 95% CI of the absolute difference in MACE in the per-protocol population was below the predefined margin (-3·83 to 3·93%, p=0·0217). After 12 months, the proportions of MACE were similar in both groups of the full-analysis population (MACE was 7·5% for the DCB group vs 7·3% for the DES group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·97 [95% CI 0·58-1·64], p=0·9180). There were five (1·3%) cardiac-related deaths in the DES group and 12 (3·1%) in the DCB group (full analysis population). Probable or definite stent thrombosis (three [0·8%] in the DCB group vs four [1·1%] in the DES group; HR 0·73 [0·16-3·26]) and major bleeding (four [1·1%] in the DCB group vs nine [2·4%] in the DES group; HR 0·45 [0·14-1·46]) were the most common adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

In small native coronary artery disease, DCB was non-inferior to DES regarding MACE up to 12 months, with similar event rates for both treatment groups.

FUNDING

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation, and B Braun Medical AG.

摘要

背景

药物涂层球囊(DCB)是一种治疗小口径原生冠状动脉疾病的新型治疗策略。然而,与药物洗脱支架(DES)相比,其安全性和疗效尚未得到明确界定。

方法

BASKET-SMALL 2 是一项多中心、开放标签、随机非劣效性试验。758 例存在新出现的(<3 毫米直径)病变且需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,通过交互式互联网响应系统成功进行预扩张后,随机(1:1)分配接受 DCB 血管成形术或第二代 DES 植入。根据当前指南给予双联抗血小板治疗。主要终点是证明 DCB 与 DES 在 12 个月时主要不良心脏事件(MACE;即心脏死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建)方面非劣效。非劣效性边界为 MACE 绝对差异 4%。本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01574534。

结果

2012 年 4 月 10 日至 2017 年 2 月 1 日期间,382 例患者被随机分配至 DCB 组,376 例患者被随机分配至 DES 组。在符合方案人群中,MACE 的绝对差异的 95%CI 低于预设的边界(-3.83 至 3.93%,p=0.0217),表明 DCB 不劣于 DES。在 12 个月时,两组全分析人群的 MACE 比例相似(DCB 组为 7.5%,DES 组为 7.3%;风险比[HR]0.97[95%CI 0.58-1.64],p=0.9180)。DES 组有 5 例(1.3%)与心脏相关的死亡,DCB 组有 12 例(3.1%)(全分析人群)。可能或确定的支架血栓形成(DCB 组 3 例[0.8%],DES 组 4 例[1.1%];HR 0.73[0.16-3.26])和大出血(DCB 组 4 例[1.1%],DES 组 9 例[2.4%];HR 0.45[0.14-1.46])是最常见的不良事件。

结论

在小口径原生冠状动脉疾病中,DCB 与 DES 相比,在 12 个月时在 MACE 方面不劣效,两组治疗的事件发生率相似。

资助

瑞士国家科学基金会、巴塞尔心血管研究基金会和 B Braun Medical AG。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验