Suppr超能文献

标准导航与术中计算机断层扫描导航在上颈椎创伤中的比较。

Standard navigation versus intraoperative computed tomography navigation in upper cervical spine trauma.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Jan;14(1):169-182. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1853-0. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In surgery of C1-C2 fractures, standard navigation for screw placement based on preoperative image data was compared with intraoperative imaging guidance applying intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) with a special focus on accuracy of screw placement, workflow, and radiation exposure.

METHODS

A single surgeon series of 16 consecutive patients with C1-C2 trauma was retrospectively analyzed. Seven patients were operated with standard navigation; preoperative image data were registered by a 20-point surface-matching process for each vertebra. Nine patients were operated with iCT guidance, allowing automatic navigation registration. Screw placement was examined and graded with either iCT or postoperative CT. Dose length product of CT and dose area products of fluoroscopy scans were assessed; effective radiation doses were estimated based on conversion factors. Radiation doses of intraoperative and postoperative X-ray and/or CT diagnostics for each group were summarized to compare the total effective doses.

RESULTS

A total number of 72 screws were placed, 26 in the standard navigation group including 24 screws in C1 and C2, and 46 screws in the iCT group including 34 screws in C1 and C2. 15.38% (n = 4) of the C2 screws showed a grade 1 deviation and 3.8% (n = 1) a grade 2 deviation applying standard navigation. There was no misplacement of screws in the iCT group. Mean operating time in the standard navigation group was 186.57 min versus 157.11 min in the iCT group, while the mean summarized effective dose was 1.129 mSv in the standard navigation and 2.129 mSv in the iCT group.

CONCLUSION

iCT navigated surgery can lead to higher accuracy and shorter operating time compared to standard navigated operations. iCT is a safe and straightforward procedure allowing reduction in radiation exposure of the medical staff, while modified scan protocols resulted in a radiation exposure that is lower than in standard diagnostic neck CT.

摘要

目的

在 C1-C2 骨折的手术中,比较了基于术前图像数据的标准导航螺钉放置与术中应用特殊术中计算机断层扫描(iCT)的图像引导,重点关注螺钉放置的准确性、工作流程和辐射暴露。

方法

回顾性分析了一位外科医生连续治疗的 16 例 C1-C2 创伤患者。7 例患者接受标准导航手术;为每个椎骨通过 20 个点的表面匹配过程对术前图像数据进行了注册。9 例患者接受 iCT 引导,允许自动导航注册。使用 iCT 或术后 CT 检查和分级螺钉放置情况。评估 CT 的剂量长度乘积和透视扫描的剂量面积乘积;根据转换因子估计有效辐射剂量。总结了每组术中及术后 X 线和/或 CT 诊断的辐射剂量,以比较总有效剂量。

结果

共放置了 72 颗螺钉,标准导航组 26 颗,包括 C1 和 C2 中的 24 颗螺钉,iCT 组 46 颗,包括 C1 和 C2 中的 34 颗螺钉。应用标准导航时,C2 螺钉中有 15.38%(n=4)出现 1 级偏差,3.8%(n=1)出现 2 级偏差。iCT 组无螺钉错位。标准导航组的平均手术时间为 186.57 分钟,iCT 组为 157.11 分钟,而标准导航组的平均总结有效剂量为 1.129 mSv,iCT 组为 2.129 mSv。

结论

与标准导航手术相比,iCT 导航手术可提高准确性并缩短手术时间。iCT 是一种安全且直接的程序,可减少医护人员的辐射暴露,而修改后的扫描方案使辐射暴露低于标准颈部 CT 诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验