Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Oct;151(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency occurs in 20-40% of endometrial cancers but its therapeutic implication remains uncertain. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes after adjuvant therapy between MMR deficient and proficient endometrial cancers from a population-based study.
This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all endometrial cancers from the Vancouver Coastal Health authority region from 2011 to 2016, for which adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) was administered. Primary outcome measure was recurrence rates, expressed per 100 person-years (p100 py). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and covariates were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.
There were 535 patients who received adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy), including 162 (30.3%) and 373 (69.7%) with MMR-deficient and proficient tumors, respectively. Demographic variables were similar except MMR-deficient patients were younger (62.0 vs. 64.8, p = 0.01). Patients with MMR-deficient tumors were more likely to have endometrioid histotype (85.8% vs. 61.4%), more likely to have Stage I disease (62.3% vs 54.7%), and LVSI (65.4% vs. 53.4%) compared to those with MMR-proficient tumors. There was a trend for MMR-proficient group to have higher recurrence rates (10.7 p100 py vs 5.9 p100 py) and MMR deficiency was associated with better OS and PFS, but on multivariable analysis, MMR status was no longer significant.
Women with MMR-deficient endometrial cancers who receive adjuvant therapy have a lower rate of recurrence compared to those with MMR-proficient cancers. However, on multivariable analysis, MMR status does not remain associated with differences in PFS or OS.
错配修复(MMR)缺陷发生在 20-40%的子宫内膜癌中,但它的治疗意义仍不确定。我们的目的是通过基于人群的研究比较 MMR 缺陷和功能正常的子宫内膜癌患者接受辅助治疗后的临床结局。
这是一项回顾性的基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2011 年至 2016 年温哥华沿海卫生局区域内所有接受辅助治疗(放疗和/或化疗)的子宫内膜癌患者。主要观察指标为复发率,以每 100 人年(p100py)表示。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验比较无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率(OS),并使用 Cox 比例风险回归评估协变量。
共有 535 例患者接受了辅助治疗(放疗和/或化疗),其中 162 例(30.3%)和 373 例(69.7%)的 MMR 缺陷和功能正常的肿瘤。除了 MMR 缺陷的患者更年轻(62.0 岁比 64.8 岁,p=0.01)外,人口统计学变量相似。与 MMR 功能正常的肿瘤相比,MMR 缺陷的肿瘤患者更有可能具有子宫内膜样组织学类型(85.8%比 61.4%)、更有可能患有 I 期疾病(62.3%比 54.7%)和 LVSI(65.4%比 53.4%)。MMR 功能正常的肿瘤患者有更高的复发率趋势(10.7 p100py 比 5.9 p100py),而 MMR 缺陷与更好的 OS 和 PFS 相关,但多变量分析显示 MMR 状态不再具有统计学意义。
接受辅助治疗的 MMR 缺陷子宫内膜癌患者的复发率低于 MMR 功能正常的肿瘤患者。然而,多变量分析显示,MMR 状态与 PFS 或 OS 无差异不再相关。