Cosgrove Casey M, Cohn David E, Hampel Heather, Frankel Wendy L, Jones Dan, McElroy Joseph P, Suarez Adrian A, Zhao Weiqiang, Chen Wei, Salani Ritu, Copeland Larry J, O'Malley David M, Fowler Jeffrey M, Yilmaz Ahmet, Chassen Alexis S, Pearlman Rachel, Goodfellow Paul J, Backes Floor J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States.
Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):588-595. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
To determine the relationship between mismatch repair (MMR) classification and clinicopathologic features including tumor volume, and explore outcomes by MMR class in a contemporary cohort.
Single institution cohort evaluating MMR classification for endometrial cancers (EC). MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC)±microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and reflex MLH1 methylation testing was performed. Tumors with MMR abnormalities by IHC or MSI and MLH1 methylation were classified as epigenetic MMR deficiency while those without MLH1 methylation were classified as probable MMR mutations. Clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed.
466 endometrial cancers were classified; 75% as MMR proficient, 20% epigenetic MMR defects, and 5% as probable MMR mutations. Epigenetic MMR defects were associated with advanced stage, higher grade, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, and older age. MMR class was significantly associated with tumor volume, an association not previously reported. The epigenetic MMR defect tumors median volume was 10,220mm compared to 3321mm and 2,846mm, for MMR proficient and probable MMR mutations respectively (P<0.0001). Higher tumor volume was associated with lymph node involvement. Endometrioid EC cases with epigenetic MMR defects had significantly reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among advanced stage (III/IV) endometrioid EC the epigenetic MMR defect group was more likely to recur compared to the MMR proficient group (47.7% vs 3.4%) despite receiving similar adjuvant therapy. In contrast, there was no difference in the number of early stage recurrences for the different MMR classes.
MMR testing that includes MLH1 methylation analysis defines a subset of tumors that have worse prognostic features and reduced RFS.
确定错配修复(MMR)分类与包括肿瘤体积在内的临床病理特征之间的关系,并在当代队列中按MMR类别探索预后情况。
对单一机构队列中的子宫内膜癌(EC)进行MMR分类评估。进行了MMR免疫组织化学(IHC)±微卫星不稳定性(MSI)检测以及MLH1甲基化检测。通过IHC或MSI及MLH1甲基化检测发现MMR异常的肿瘤被分类为表观遗传MMR缺陷,而无MLH1甲基化的肿瘤被分类为可能的MMR突变。对临床病理特征进行分析。
共对466例子宫内膜癌进行了分类;75%为MMR功能正常,20%为表观遗传MMR缺陷,5%为可能的MMR突变。表观遗传MMR缺陷与晚期、高分级、存在淋巴管间隙浸润以及年龄较大相关。MMR类别与肿瘤体积显著相关,这是此前未报道过的关联。表观遗传MMR缺陷肿瘤的中位体积为10220立方毫米,而MMR功能正常和可能的MMR突变肿瘤的中位体积分别为3321立方毫米和2846立方毫米(P<0.0001)。较高的肿瘤体积与淋巴结受累相关。具有表观遗传MMR缺陷的子宫内膜样EC病例的无复发生存期(RFS)显著缩短。在晚期(III/IV期)子宫内膜样EC中,尽管接受了相似的辅助治疗,但表观遗传MMR缺陷组比MMR功能正常组更易复发(47.7%对3.4%)。相比之下,不同MMR类别的早期复发数量没有差异。
包括MLH1甲基化分析的MMR检测确定了一组预后特征较差且RFS降低的肿瘤亚组。