Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物依赖的药物治疗:系统评价。

Pharmacotherapy for amphetamine dependence: A systematic review.

机构信息

National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, 7 Parker Place, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia; 360Edge Consulting, P.O. Box 359, Elwood, 3184, Victoria, Australia.

360Edge Consulting, P.O. Box 359, Elwood, 3184, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Oct 1;191:309-337. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.038. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Demand for treatment for amphetamine use is increasing internationally. Establishing effective pharmacotherapy provides broader treatment options for people who are dependent on amphetamine and may encourage engagement in evidence-based behavioral treatment. This study aimed to identify medicines that have potential in improving treatment outcomes for people who are dependent on amphetamines.

METHODS

Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 1997 to 2012 and again from 2013 to 2016. Studies on medications for amphetamine/methamphetamine dependence treatment were selected and assessed by two independent researchers. A meta-narrative review approach was used to synthesize results.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies investigating 20 potential pharmacotherapies were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 35 studies related to 33 level II quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five medications were subject to multiple RCTs. Four of these medicines demonstrated some limited evidence of benefit for reducing amphetamine use: methylphenidate (as reported in three studies), bupropion (in three studies), modafinil (two studies), and naltrexone (one study). Four RCTs of dexamphetamine suggest its benefit on secondary outcomes such as treatment retention, but not for reducing amphetamine use. Six other medicines indicate the potential for efficacy, but the number of studies is too small to draw conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

No medicine has as yet demonstrated sufficient, consistent evidence of effectiveness to support its use in routine treatment. High study drop-out and poor medication adherence limits the strength of evidence and raises important clinical questions about how to improve treatment engagement and outcomes.

摘要

背景

国际上对治疗安非他命使用的需求正在增加。建立有效的药物治疗为依赖安非他命的人提供了更广泛的治疗选择,并可能鼓励他们参与基于证据的行为治疗。本研究旨在确定具有改善依赖安非他命者治疗效果潜力的药物。

方法

从 1997 年到 2012 年以及 2013 年到 2016 年,对 Medline、PsycINFO、Embase 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库进行了检索。选择并由两名独立研究人员评估了关于治疗安非他命/甲基苯丙胺依赖的药物研究。采用元叙述性综述方法来综合结果。

结果

共有 49 项研究调查了 20 种潜在的药物治疗方法,符合纳入标准。其中,35 项研究与 33 项二级质量随机对照试验(RCT)相关。五种药物受到多项 RCT 的研究。其中四种药物显示出一些有限的减少安非他命使用的益处:哌醋甲酯(在三项研究中报告)、安非他酮(在三项研究中)、莫达非尼(两项研究)和纳曲酮(一项研究)。四项关于右旋苯丙胺的 RCT 表明其对治疗保留等次要结果有益,但对减少安非他命使用无益。其他六种药物表明有疗效的潜力,但研究数量太少,无法得出结论。

结论

目前还没有一种药物具有足够、一致的有效性证据,无法支持其在常规治疗中的使用。高研究退出率和较差的药物依从性限制了证据的强度,并提出了关于如何提高治疗参与度和结果的重要临床问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验