Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran; Institute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany.
Institute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018 Dec 1;172:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.08.044. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
Water protection and bioremediation strategies in the vadose zone require understanding the factors controlling bacterial transport for different hydraulic conditions. Breakthrough experiments were made in two different flow conditions: i) an initial bacteria pulse under ponded infiltration into dry sand (-15,000 cm); ii) a second bacteria pulse into the same columns during subsequent infiltration in constant water content and steady-state flow. Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Rhodococcus erythropolis (R. erythropolis) were used to represent hydrophilic and hydrophobic bacteria, respectively. Equilibrium and attachment/detachment models were tested to fit bromide (Br) and bacteria transport data using HYDRUS-1D. Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) and extended DVLO (XDLVO) interaction energy profiles were calculated to predict bacteria sorption at particles. Adsorption of bacteria at air-water interfaces was estimated by a hydrophobic force approach. Results suggested greater retention of bacteria in water repellent sand compared with wettable sand. Inverse parameter optimization suggested that physico-chemical attachment of both E. coli and R. erythropolis was thousands of times lower in wettable than repellant sand and straining was 10-fold lower in E. coli for wettable vs repellant sand compared to the exact opposite by orders of magnitude with R. erythropolis. HYDRUS did not provide a clear priority of importance of solid-water or air-water interfaces in bacteria retention. Optimized model parameters did not show a clear relation to the (X)DLVO adsorption energies. This illustrated the ambivalence of (X)DLVO to predict bacterial attachment at solid soil particles of different wetting properties. Simultaneous analysis of mass recovery, numerical modeling, and interaction energy profiles thus suggested irreversible straining due to bacteria sizing as dominant compared to attachment to liquid-solid or liquid-air interfaces. Further studies are needed to distinguish straining mechanisms (i.e. pore structure or film straining) in different hydraulic conditions.
包气带中的水保护和生物修复策略需要了解在不同水力条件下控制细菌运移的因素。在两种不同的流动条件下进行了突破实验:i)在干沙中积水入渗(-15000cm)下进行初始细菌脉冲;ii)在恒定含水量和稳定流条件下对同一柱进行第二次细菌脉冲。使用大肠杆菌(E. coli)和红球菌(R. erythropolis)分别代表亲水和疏水细菌。使用 HYDRUS-1D 测试平衡和附着/脱附模型以拟合溴化物(Br)和细菌运移数据。计算了德加古林-兰德维厄-奥弗贝克(DLVO)和扩展的 DLVO(XDLVO)相互作用能曲线,以预测颗粒上的细菌吸附。通过疏水力方法估计细菌在气-水界面上的吸附。结果表明,与可湿性砂相比,疏水性砂对细菌的保留能力更强。反向参数优化表明,在可湿性砂中,E. coli 和 R. erythropolis 的物理化学附着比疏水性砂低数千倍,而在可湿性砂中,E. coli 的应变比疏水性砂低 10 倍,与 R. erythropolis 相反,数量级相差数千倍。HYDRUS 并没有提供一个明确的固体-水或气-水界面在细菌保留中的重要性优先级。优化模型参数与(X)DLVO 吸附能之间没有明显的关系。这说明了(X)DLVO 在预测不同润湿性土壤颗粒上细菌附着时的矛盾性。因此,质量回收的同时分析、数值模拟和相互作用能曲线表明,由于细菌尺寸的不可逆应变是主要的,与附着在液体-固体或液体-空气界面相比。需要进一步的研究来区分不同水力条件下的应变机制(即孔隙结构或膜应变)。