Department of Zoology/Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Straße 44, Bldg. 91, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
PG "Epigenetics and Structural Plasticity", Institute of Biology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Mol Neurobiol. 2019 May;56(5):3616-3625. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1199-1. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
Early-life adversity (ELA) represents a major risk factor for the development of behavioral dysfunctions and mental disorders later in life. On the other hand, dependent on type, time point, and duration, ELA exposure can also induce adaptations, which result in better stress coping and resilience later in life. Guided by the hypothesis that chronic exposure to ELA results in dysfunctional brain and behavior, whereas short exposure to ELA may result in resilience, the behavioral and neurobiological consequences of long-term separation stress (LTSS) and short-term separation stress (STSS) were compared in a mouse model for ELA. In line with our hypothesis, we found that LTSS induced depressive-like behavior, whereas STSS reduced depressive-like behavioral symptoms. We then tested the hypothesis that the opposite behavioral outcomes of the two stress paradigms may be mediated by functional, epigenetically regulated changes of dopaminergic modulation in the hippocampal formation. We found that STSS exposure elevated dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1) gene expression and decreased gene expression of its downstream modulator DARPP-32 (32-kDa dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein), which was paralleled by decreased H3 acetylation at its gene promoter region. In contrast, LTSS elevated DARPP-32 gene expression, which was not paralleled by changes in histone acetylation and DRD1 gene expression. These findings indicate that short- and long-term neonatal exposure to ELA induces changes in dopaminergic molecular pathways, some of which are epigenetically regulated and which either alleviate or aggravate depressive-like symptoms later in life.
早期生活逆境(ELA)代表了一生中行为功能障碍和精神障碍发展的主要危险因素。另一方面,取决于类型、时间点和持续时间,ELA 暴露也可以诱导适应,从而在以后的生活中更好地应对压力和保持韧性。基于慢性暴露于 ELA 会导致大脑和行为功能障碍,而短期暴露于 ELA 可能会导致韧性的假设,我们在 ELA 的小鼠模型中比较了长期分离应激(LTSS)和短期分离应激(STSS)的行为和神经生物学后果。与我们的假设一致,我们发现 LTSS 诱导了抑郁样行为,而 STSS 减轻了抑郁样行为症状。然后,我们测试了这样一个假设,即两种应激范式的相反行为结果可能是由海马结构中多巴胺能调节的功能、表观遗传调节变化介导的。我们发现 STSS 暴露会增加多巴胺受体 D1(DRD1)基因的表达,并降低其下游调节剂 DARPP-32(32-kDa 多巴胺和 cAMP 调节磷酸蛋白)的基因表达,这与基因启动子区域的 H3 乙酰化减少相平行。相反,LTSS 会增加 DARPP-32 基因的表达,但不伴随组蛋白乙酰化和 DRD1 基因表达的变化。这些发现表明,新生儿期短期和长期暴露于 ELA 会导致多巴胺能分子途径发生变化,其中一些受表观遗传调控,这些变化要么减轻要么加重以后的抑郁样症状。