MacKay Emily J, Groeneveld Peter W, Fleisher Lee A, Desai Nimesh D, Gutsche Jacob T, Augoustides John G, Patel Prakash A, Neuman Mark D
Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Penn Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Penn's Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Penn's Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jan;33(1):118-133. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.07.040. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
The authors sought to assess for the presence of practice variation in the use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for open cardiac valve surgery.
This study was a retrospective cohort analysis.
The administrative claims data used for this investigation were multi-institutional and a representative sample of commercially insured patients in the United States between 2010 and 2015.
The cohort consisted of adult patients, aged 18 years or older, undergoing open mitral valve (MV) or aortic valve (AV) surgery.
This was an observational analysis without interventions.
Of 19,386 valve surgeries, 12,313 (64%) underwent AV replacement, 6,192 (32%) underwent MV repair or replacement, and 881 (<5%) underwent both MV and AV surgery. The overall rate of intraoperative TEE was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%-82%), less frequently observed in AV procedures compared to MV or combined MV-AV procedures (80% v 85%, p < 0.001). Rates of intraoperative TEE claims varied markedly across U.S. states. After adjustment, the relative odds of an intraoperative TEE claim ranged across states from 0.26 (Louisiana, 95% CI: 0.18-0.36; p < 0.001) to 2.10 (North Carolina, 95% CI: 1.57-2.82; p < 0.001).
Among adult patients undergoing open AV or MV surgery in the United States, 82% had a claim for an intraoperative TEE with marked variability across U.S. states. Increasing adherence to intraoperative TEE guidelines for valve surgery may represent an unrecognized opportunity to improve the quality of cardiac surgical care.
作者试图评估在心脏瓣膜开放手术中使用术中经食管超声心动图(TEE)时是否存在实践差异。
本研究为回顾性队列分析。
用于本调查的行政索赔数据来自多个机构,是2010年至2015年期间美国商业保险患者的代表性样本。
队列包括18岁及以上接受二尖瓣(MV)或主动脉瓣(AV)开放手术的成年患者。
这是一项无干预的观察性分析。
在19386例瓣膜手术中,12313例(64%)接受了主动脉瓣置换术,6192例(32%)接受了二尖瓣修复或置换术,881例(<5%)同时接受了二尖瓣和主动脉瓣手术。术中TEE的总体使用率为82%(95%置信区间[CI]:81%-82%),与二尖瓣或二尖瓣-主动脉瓣联合手术相比,在主动脉瓣手术中观察到的频率较低(80%对85%,p<0.001)。术中TEE索赔率在美国各州之间差异显著。调整后,术中TEE索赔的相对比值在各州之间从0.26(路易斯安那州,95%CI:0.18-0.36;p<0.001)到2.10(北卡罗来纳州,95%CI:1.57-2.82;p<0.001)不等。
在美国接受主动脉瓣或二尖瓣开放手术的成年患者中,82%有术中TEE索赔,且在美国各州之间存在显著差异。提高对瓣膜手术术中TEE指南的依从性可能是改善心脏手术护理质量的一个未被认识到的机会。