Efficacy of antidotes and their combinations in the treatment of acute carbamate poisoning in rats.

BACKGROUND

Physostigmine and its analogues neostigmine, pyridostigmine and rivastigmine are carbamates nowadays used in many indications, including antidotal effects against antimuscarinic poisonings, reversal of competitive neuromuscular block, myasthenia gravis, Alzheimer's disease and prophylaxis against nerve agent intoxications. Use of these medicinal carbamates, but also of carbamate insecticides, created need for research into the potential and mechanisms of action of several antidotes against carbamate poisonings, including anticholinergics and oximes.

AIM

The goal of this experimental study was to ascertain the life-preserving potential of anticholinergics atropine, hexamethonium and d-tubocurarine, oxime HI-6 and their combinations in rats poisoned with physostigmine or pyridostigmine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiments were performed in Wistar rats. Carbamates were injected subcutaneously (sc) and antidotes intramuscularly (im). Median lethal dose (LD) in animals treated with antidotes were compared to the ones in saline-treated rats and protective ratios (PRs) were calculated. Atropine (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg), hexamethonium (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg), d-tubocurarine (0.005, 0.010 and 0.020 mg/kg) and oxime HI-6 (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) were used as monotherapies and in dual combinations, where atropine was the obligatory antidote. Biochemical experiments consisted in measuring of the cholinesterase activities in brain, whole blood and diaphragm in rats 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after poisoning with 0.8 LD of physostigmine or pyridostigmine.

RESULTS

All the tested antidotes assured some degree of protection against the two carbamates. Atropine and hexamethonium produced better protection in physostigmine-poisoned rats, while d-tubocurarine and HI-6 were more efficacious in pyridostigmine-intoxicated animals. Oxime HI-6 50 mg/kg reactivated acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in brain inhibited by physostigmine and in diaphragm inhibited by pyridostigmine.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanism of physostigmine-induced lethal effect is predominantly central and it involves inhibition of brain AChE, while pyridostigmine produces the same effect exclusively outside the central nervous system, by inhibiting AChE in the respiratory muscles. As a consequence, increasing doses of atropine and their combination with hexamethonium assure excellent protection against physostigmine toxicity, while the best protection against pyridostigmine is provided by a strictly peripherally acting antinicotinic d-tubocurarine and bispyridinium oxime HI-6. The oxime acts as antidote against physostigmine and pyridostigmine poisoning by reactivating AChE in the brain and diaphragm, respectively.