Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 1;649:661-671. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.319. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
Wildlife on sandy beaches is often constrained by transformation of natural areas for human use, and opportunities for acquiring or restoring new habitat are rare. Storms can often force changes in land use naturally by re-shaping coastal landforms, thereby creating high quality habitat; yet, wildlife requirements are seldom considered in post-storm recovery planning, and conservation practitioners lack suitable evidence to argue for the protection of habitats freshly formed by storms. Here we used a maximum-likelihood spatial modeling approach to quantify impacts of Hurricane Sandy (mid-Atlantic United States, October 2012) on nesting habitat of four bird species of conservation concern: American oystercatchers, black skimmers, least terns and piping plovers. We calculated the immediate storm-created changes (loss, persisting, gained) in nesting habitat under two levels of conservation protections: the current regulatory framework, and a scenario in which all potential habitats were under conservation protection. Hurricane Sandy resulted in apparent large gains for least terns (+181 ha) and piping plovers (+289 ha). However, actual gains were reduced to 16 ha for plovers and reversed for least terns (net loss of 6.4 ha) because newly formed habitat occurred outside existing reserve boundaries. Similarly, under the current management framework, black skimmer nesting habitat decreased by ~164 ha. We also tested whether birds benefited from newly created nesting habitat by identifying nest and colony locations for three years following Hurricane Sandy. All species overwhelmingly nested in habitat that existed prior the storm (76-98% of all nests/colonies); only a small percentage (≤17% for all species) occupied newly created habitat. We conclude that static spatial conservation efforts fail to capitalize on potentially large gains resulting from storms for several species and recommend flexible spatial conservation investments as a key input in post-storm recovery planning.
野生动物在沙滩上的生存常常受到人类活动改变自然区域的限制,获得或恢复新栖息地的机会很少。风暴常常通过重塑沿海地貌自然地改变土地利用,从而创造高质量的栖息地;然而,在风暴后恢复规划中很少考虑野生动物的需求,保护实践人员也缺乏适当的证据来主张保护刚刚由风暴形成的栖息地。在这里,我们使用最大似然空间建模方法来量化 2012 年 10 月发生在美国中大西洋地区的桑迪飓风对四种受关注鸟类(美洲蛎鹬、黑燕鸥、燕鸥和勺嘴鹬)筑巢栖息地的影响。我们在两种保护水平下计算了筑巢栖息地在风暴中立即发生的变化(损失、持续、获得):当前监管框架和所有潜在栖息地都受到保护的情景。桑迪飓风导致燕鸥 (+181 公顷) 和勺嘴鹬 (+289 公顷) 的筑巢栖息地明显增加。然而,由于新形成的栖息地位于现有保护区边界之外,实际增加量减少到 16 公顷,而燕鸥的筑巢栖息地则出现净损失(6.4 公顷)。同样,在当前管理框架下,黑燕鸥的筑巢栖息地减少了约 164 公顷。我们还通过识别桑迪飓风后三年的鸟巢和鸟群位置,测试了鸟类是否从新形成的筑巢栖息地中受益。所有物种都在风暴前存在的栖息地中筑巢(所有鸟巢/鸟群的 76-98%);只有一小部分(所有物种的≤17%)占据了新形成的栖息地。我们的结论是,静态空间保护努力未能充分利用风暴为多个物种带来的潜在大量收益,并建议灵活的空间保护投资作为风暴后恢复规划的关键投入。