• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣供区疝和隆起的因素。

Factors that predict deep inferior epigastric perforator flap donor site hernia and bulge.

作者信息

Butler Daniel P, Plonczak Agata M, Reissis Dimitris, Henry Francis P, Hunter Judith E, Wood Simon H, Jallali Navid

机构信息

a Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , Imperial College Hospital NHS Trust , London , UK.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Dec;52(6):338-342. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1498790. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1080/2000656X.2018.1498790
PMID:30178700
Abstract

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Attention is now being focused on the impact of DIEP flap harvest technique on abdominal hernia rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate DIEP abdominal wall morbidity in relation to flap harvest and fascial closure technique. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2016 was performed. Post-operative evaluation of the abdominal wall integrity was performed by an operating consultant. The rectus fascia was closed using one of three techniques. The study included 202 patients, in whom 234 DIEP flaps were performed. Eight patients (3.4%) developed a clinically evident abdominal bulge post-operatively and one (0.5%) had a hernia. Harvesting two or more perforators was more likely to result in post-operative abdominal hernia/bulge than taking a single perforator ( = .032). Using a perforator from the lateral row or both rows was more likely to result in a hernia/bulge than if a single medial perforator was harvested ( = .026). Comparison of the rectus fascia closure technique did not show any statistically significant difference in abdominal wall morbidity. Consideration should be given towards perforator selection when harvesting a DIEP flap. Where appropriate, a suitable single medial row perforator with a favourable suprafascial course should be chosen. This study has not shown mesh-free fascial closure to be inferior to mesh-supported closure. Careful consideration to the role of synthetic mesh within this patient cohort should be given.

摘要

腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣已成为自体乳房重建的金标准。目前,人们的注意力集中在DIEP皮瓣切取技术对腹部疝发生率的影响上。本研究的目的是评估与皮瓣切取和筋膜关闭技术相关的DIEP腹壁并发症。对2012年至2016年间接受DIEP皮瓣乳房重建的患者进行了回顾性分析。由手术顾问对腹壁完整性进行术后评估。腹直肌筋膜采用三种技术之一进行关闭。该研究纳入了202例患者,共进行了234例DIEP皮瓣手术。8例患者(3.4%)术后出现临床上明显的腹部膨隆,1例(0.5%)发生疝。切取两个或更多穿支比切取单个穿支更易导致术后腹部疝/膨隆(P = 0.032)。与切取单个内侧穿支相比,切取外侧排或两排的穿支更易导致疝/膨隆(P = 0.026)。腹直肌筋膜关闭技术的比较在腹壁并发症方面未显示出任何统计学上的显著差异。切取DIEP皮瓣时应考虑穿支的选择。在合适的情况下,应选择走行于筋膜上且合适的单个内侧排穿支。本研究未表明无网片筋膜关闭不如有网片支撑的关闭。应仔细考虑合成网片在该患者群体中的作用。

相似文献

1
Factors that predict deep inferior epigastric perforator flap donor site hernia and bulge.预测腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣供区疝和隆起的因素。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Dec;52(6):338-342. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1498790. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
Evaluating mesh use for abdominal donor site closure after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评价腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术后应用网片关闭供区的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Microsurgery. 2023 Nov;43(8):855-864. doi: 10.1002/micr.31107. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
3
Comparison of abdominal wall morbidity between medial and lateral row-based deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.基于腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣内侧和外侧排的腹壁并发症比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Nov;68(11):1550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.06.028. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
4
Abdominal weakness, bulge, or hernia after DIEP flaps: An algorithm of management, prevention, and surgical repair with classification.腹部薄弱、膨出或 DIEP 皮瓣后疝:一种管理、预防和手术修复的分类算法。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Sep;74(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.044. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
5
Optimizing Perforator Selection: A Multivariable Analysis of Predictors for Fat Necrosis and Abdominal Morbidity in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.优化穿支皮瓣选择:DIEP 游离皮瓣乳房重建中脂肪坏死和腹部并发症的多变量预测因素分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep;142(3):583-592. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004631.
6
Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.腹壁皮瓣游离乳房重建供区并发症的综合分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1383-1391. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3.
7
Abdominal donor-site outcomes for medial versus lateral deep inferior epigastric artery branch perforator harvest.腹部供区结局比较:内侧与外侧腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣游离移植。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2198-2205. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131caf.
8
Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap abdominal harvest for breast reconstruction: A case report.机器人辅助下腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术:一例报告
Microsurgery. 2018 Sep;38(6):702-705. doi: 10.1002/micr.30297. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.网片在游离 TRAM 皮瓣和保留肌肉的游离 TRAM 皮瓣供区修复中的应用,其腹部并发症发生率与 DIEP 皮瓣重建相当。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):367-374. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de1b7e.
10
Reducing Postoperative Abdominal Bulge Following Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction with Onlay Monofilament Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Biosynthetic Mesh.使用覆盖式单丝聚-4-羟基丁酸生物合成网片减少腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术后的腹部膨隆
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Jan;33(1):8-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586495. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Penile Reconstruction with Radial Forearm Free Flap-Present State of the Art.桡侧前臂游离皮瓣阴茎重建术——当前技术现状
Indian J Plast Surg. 2024 Sep 26;57(Suppl 1):S58-S64. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791195. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair of abdominal bulge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a case report.乳腺癌DIEP皮瓣乳房重建术后腹部膨出的强化视野完全腹膜外修补术:病例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2024 Nov 11;10(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-02056-9.
3
Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures.
腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣腹部供区使用网片缝合的早期经验
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Aug 22;12(8):e6095. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006095. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Long-term Donor Site-related Quality of Life after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术后供区相关生活质量的长期随访
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 30;12(7):e6011. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006011. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Is There a Difference in Abdominal Wall Muscle Strength, Endurance, and Motor Control Following Bilateral DIEP and TRAM Flaps for Breast Reconstruction?双侧腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣和横行腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术后腹壁肌肉力量、耐力和运动控制是否存在差异?
Eplasty. 2024 May 23;24:e30. eCollection 2024.
6
Optimizing the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Lessons Learned from 110 Consecutive Flaps.优化带蒂背阔肌肌皮瓣在乳房重建中的应用:来自连续110例皮瓣的经验教训
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 May 9;12(5):e5791. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005791. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Multidisciplinary approach to anaplastic and metastatic meningioma: A case report and review of the literature.间变性和转移性脑膜瘤的多学科治疗方法:一例病例报告及文献综述
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Jul 7;14:230. doi: 10.25259/SNI_222_2023. eCollection 2023.
8
Bulging after DIEP Breast Reconstruction: New Insights Concerning Rectus Diastasis and Medial Perforator Harvest.腹壁下动脉穿支乳房重建术后的膨出:关于腹直肌分离和内侧穿支获取的新见解
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Mar 8;11(3):e4840. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004840. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Long-Term Results after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP versus PAP Flaps Based on Quality of Life and Aesthetic Outcome Analysis.基于生活质量和美学效果分析的腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣与旋股外侧动脉降支皮瓣自体乳房重建术后长期结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 17;12(3):737. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030737.
10
Influence of vertical location and spacing of perforators on perfusion in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: quantitative analysis using indocyanine green angiography.穿支血管垂直位置和间距对腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建中灌注的影响:使用吲哚菁绿血管造影术的定量分析
Gland Surg. 2022 Dec;11(12):1851-1863. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-371.