• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择疑似肺栓塞的孕妇或产后妇女进行诊断成像:采用决策分析模型的 DiPEP 诊断研究。

Selecting pregnant or postpartum women with suspected pulmonary embolism for diagnostic imaging: the DiPEP diagnostic study with decision-analysis modelling.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(47):1-230. doi: 10.3310/hta22470.

DOI:10.3310/hta22470
PMID:30178738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6139476/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of death in pregnancy and post partum, but the symptoms of PE are common in normal pregnancy. Simple diagnostic tests are needed to select women for diagnostic imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clinical features, decision rules and biomarkers for selecting pregnant or postpartum women with a suspected PE for imaging.

DESIGN

An expert consensus study to develop new clinical decision rules, a case-control study of women with a diagnosed PE or a suspected PE, a biomarker study of women with a suspected PE or diagnosed deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and decision-analysis modelling.

SETTING

Emergency departments and consultant-led maternity units.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant/postpartum women with a diagnosed PE from any hospital reporting to the UK Obstetric Surveillance System research platform and pregnant/postpartum women with a suspected PE or diagnosed DVT at 11 prospectively recruiting sites.

INTERVENTIONS

Clinical features, decision rules and biomarkers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and health-care costs.

RESULTS

The primary analysis involved 181 women with PE and 259 women without PE in the case-control study and 18 women with DVT, 18 with PE and 247 women without either in the biomarker study. Most clinical features showed no association with PE. The AUROC curves for the clinical decision rules were as follows: primary consensus, 0.626; sensitive consensus, 0.620; specific consensus, 0.589; PE rule-out criteria, 0.621; simplified Geneva score, 0.579; Wells's PE criteria (permissive), 0.577; and Wells's PE criteria (strict), 0.732. The sensitivities and specificities of the D-dimer measurement were 88.4% and 8.8%, respectively, using a standard threshold, and 69.8% and 32.8%, respectively, using a pregnancy-specific threshold. Previous venous thromboembolism, long-haul travel, multiple pregnancy, oxygen saturation, recent surgery, temperature and PE-related chest radiograph abnormality were predictors of PE on multivariable analysis. We were unable to derive a rule through multivariable analysis or recursive partitioning with adequate accuracy. The AUROC curves for the biomarkers were as follows: activated partial thromboplastin time - 0.669, B-type natriuretic peptide - 0.549, C-reactive protein - 0.542, Clauss fibrinogen - 0.589, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer - 0.668, Innovance D-dimer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, distributed by Sysmex UK Ltd, Milton Keynes, UK) - 0.651, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MRproANP) - 0.524, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 - 0.562, plasmin-antiplasmin - 0.639, Prothombin time - 0.613, thrombin generation lag time - 0.702, thrombin generation endogenous potential - 0.559, thrombin generation peak - 0.596, thrombin generation time to peak - 0.655, tissue factor - 0.531 and troponin - 0.597. The repeat analysis excluding women who had received anticoagulation was limited by the small number of women with PE ( = 4). The health economic analysis showed that a strategy of scanning all women with a suspected PE accrued more QALYs and incurred fewer costs than any selective strategy based on a clinical decision rule and was therefore the dominant strategy.

LIMITATIONS

The findings apply specifically to the diagnostic assessment of women with a suspected PE in secondary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical features, decision rules and biomarkers do not accurately, effectively or cost-effectively select pregnant or postpartum women with a suspected PE for diagnostic imaging.

FUTURE WORK

New diagnostic technologies need to be developed to detect PE in pregnancy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN21245595.

FUNDING DETAILS

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 22, No. 47. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

摘要

背景

肺栓塞(PE)是妊娠和产后死亡的主要原因,但 PE 的症状在正常妊娠中很常见。需要简单的诊断测试来选择需要进行影像学诊断的女性。

目的

评估用于选择疑似 PE 的孕妇或产后女性进行影像学检查的临床特征、决策规则和生物标志物的准确性、有效性和成本效益。

设计

一项旨在制定新的临床决策规则的专家共识研究、一项疑似 PE 或确诊 PE 女性的病例对照研究、一项疑似 PE 或确诊深静脉血栓形成(DVT)女性的生物标志物研究以及决策分析模型。

设置

急诊室和顾问主导的产科病房。

参与者

来自英国产科监测系统研究平台报告的任何医院的确诊 PE 孕妇/产后女性和 11 个前瞻性招募点的疑似 PE 或确诊 DVT 孕妇/产后女性。

干预措施

临床特征、决策规则和生物标志物。

主要结果测量

敏感性、特异性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和医疗保健成本。

结果

主要分析涉及病例对照研究中的 181 名 PE 女性和 259 名非 PE 女性,以及生物标志物研究中的 18 名 DVT 女性、18 名 PE 女性和 247 名非 DVT/PE 女性。大多数临床特征与 PE 无关联。临床决策规则的 AUROC 曲线如下:主要共识,0.626;敏感共识,0.620;特异共识,0.589;PE 排除标准,0.621;简化日内瓦评分,0.579;Wells 的 PE 标准(宽松),0.577;和 Wells 的 PE 标准(严格),0.732。使用标准阈值时,D-二聚体检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 88.4%和 8.8%,使用妊娠特异性阈值时,敏感性和特异性分别为 69.8%和 32.8%。既往静脉血栓栓塞、长途旅行、多胎妊娠、氧饱和度、近期手术、体温和与 PE 相关的胸部 X 线异常是多变量分析中 PE 的预测因素。我们无法通过多变量分析或递归分区获得足够准确的规则。生物标志物的 AUROC 曲线如下:活化部分凝血活酶时间-0.669,B 型利钠肽-0.549,C 反应蛋白-0.542,Clauss 纤维蛋白原-0.589,酶联免疫吸附试验 D-二聚体-0.668,Innovance D-二聚体(Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH,由 Sysmex UK Ltd 分销,米尔顿凯恩斯,英国)-0.651,中区域前利尿钠肽(MRproANP)-0.524,凝血酶原片段 1+2-0.562,纤溶酶-抗纤溶酶-0.639,Prothombin 时间-0.613,凝血酶生成延迟时间-0.702,凝血酶生成内源性潜能-0.559,凝血酶生成峰-0.596,凝血酶生成时间到峰-0.655,组织因子-0.531 和肌钙蛋白-0.597。排除接受抗凝治疗的女性的重复分析受到疑似 PE 女性数量较少(n=4)的限制。健康经济学分析表明,与任何基于临床决策规则的选择性策略相比,对疑似 PE 的所有女性进行扫描的策略可获得更多的 QALYs 并减少成本,因此是主导策略。

局限性

研究结果专门适用于二级保健中疑似 PE 孕妇/产后女性的诊断评估。

结论

临床特征、决策规则和生物标志物不能准确、有效或具有成本效益地选择疑似 PE 的孕妇或产后女性进行影像学检查。

未来工作

需要开发新的诊断技术来检测妊娠中的 PE。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN21245595。

资金来源

本项目由英国国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估计划资助,全文将在 ; 第 22 卷,第 47 期发表。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。

相似文献

1
Selecting pregnant or postpartum women with suspected pulmonary embolism for diagnostic imaging: the DiPEP diagnostic study with decision-analysis modelling.选择疑似肺栓塞的孕妇或产后妇女进行诊断成像:采用决策分析模型的 DiPEP 诊断研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(47):1-230. doi: 10.3310/hta22470.
2
The DiPEP study: an observational study of the diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment, D-dimer and chest x-ray for suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy and postpartum.DiPEP 研究:一项观察性研究,评估临床评估、D-二聚体和胸部 X 线在疑似妊娠和产后肺栓塞中的诊断准确性。
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):383-392. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15286. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
3
The DiPEP (Diagnosis of PE in Pregnancy) biomarker study: An observational cohort study augmented with additional cases to determine the diagnostic utility of biomarkers for suspected venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium.DiPEP(妊娠期间 PE 的诊断)生物标志物研究:一项观察性队列研究,增加了额外的病例,以确定生物标志物在妊娠和产褥期疑似静脉血栓栓塞症中的诊断效用。
Br J Haematol. 2018 Mar;180(5):694-704. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15102. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Spot protein-creatinine ratio and spot albumin-creatinine ratio in the assessment of pre-eclampsia: a diagnostic accuracy study with decision-analytic model-based economic evaluation and acceptability analysis.尿蛋白/肌酐比值和尿白蛋白/肌酐比值在子痫前期评估中的应用:一项基于诊断准确性研究的决策分析模型经济学评价和可接受性分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(61):1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta21610.
5
Thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium: a systematic review and economic evaluation to estimate the value of future research.妊娠期和产褥期的血栓预防:一项系统评价和经济评估,以估算未来研究的价值。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(9):1-176. doi: 10.3310/DFWT3873.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis.深静脉血栓形成的非侵入性诊断检测策略的临床及成本效益测量
Health Technol Assess. 2006 May;10(15):1-168, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10150.
8
High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation.用于急性胸痛患者早期排除急性心肌梗死的高敏肌钙蛋白检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(33):1-276. doi: 10.3310/hta25330.
9
Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.用于排除血栓形成的快速酶联免疫吸附法、比浊法和凝集法D-二聚体检测的不同准确性:对疑似深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞门诊患者诊断检查的影响。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006 Oct;32(7):678-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951296.
10
Accuracy of PE rule-out strategies in pregnancy: secondary analysis of the DiPEP study prospective cohort.妊娠中应用 PE 排除策略的准确性:DiPEP 前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Jul;37(7):423-428. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209213. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision analytical modelling of strategies for investigating suspected acute aortic syndrome.疑似急性主动脉综合征的检查策略的决策分析模型。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Nov 21;41(12):728-735. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214222.
2
Stopping anticoagulation for isolated or incidental pulmonary embolism: the STOPAPE RCT protocol.孤立性或偶发性肺栓塞抗凝治疗的停用:STOPAPE随机对照试验方案
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;29(11):1-17. doi: 10.3310/HRCW7937.
3
Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk assessment models for hospital inpatients: the VTEAM evidence synthesis.医院住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的评估:VTEAM 证据综合评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Apr;28(20):1-166. doi: 10.3310/AWTW6200.
4
Thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium: a systematic review and economic evaluation to estimate the value of future research.妊娠期和产褥期的血栓预防:一项系统评价和经济评估,以估算未来研究的价值。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(9):1-176. doi: 10.3310/DFWT3873.
5
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for medical inpatients: decision analysis modelling study.内科住院患者药物性血栓预防的有效性及成本效益:决策分析模型研究
BMJ Med. 2024 Feb 21;3(1):e000408. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000408. eCollection 2024.
6
Predictive Model for Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.预测孕妇和产后妇女肺栓塞的模型:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231209930. doi: 10.1177/10760296231209930.
7
Nomogram for predicting overall survival in Chinese triple-negative breast cancer patients after surgery.预测中国三阴性乳腺癌患者术后总生存期的列线图
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Nov 6;10(31):11338-11348. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11338.
8
Pulmonary Embolism in Women: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.女性肺栓塞:当前文献的系统综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Jul 25;9(8):234. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080234.
9
10,589 CT pulmonary angiograms: evaluating the yield of acute pulmonary embolism.10589 例 CT 肺动脉造影:评估急性肺栓塞的检出率。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;95(1137):20220254. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220254. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Care of the Postpartum Patient in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review with Implications for Maternal Mortality.急诊科产后患者护理:系统评价及其对孕产妇死亡率的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 2023 Apr;40(5):489-507. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732455. Epub 2021 Jul 29.