Prout Tracy A, Gottdiener William H, Camargo Alexander, Murphy Sean
Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Bronx, New York.
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, New York.
Bull Menninger Clin. 2018 Summer;82(3):224-252. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2018.82.3.224.
This study examined the factor structure of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) and explored the relationships between defense mechanisms and religious coping in a diverse sample of 380 college students. In contrast with the three-factor model of defenses proposed by the developers of the DSQ-40, principal axis factoring yielded two internally consistent components: adaptive and maladaptive defense styles. Endorsement of adaptive defenses was positively correlated with the use of positive religious coping strategies and negatively correlated with negative religious coping. Maladaptive defenses were associated with the endorsement of negative religious coping strategies. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed and recommendations are made for future use of the DSQ-40.
本研究考察了防御方式问卷(DSQ - 40)的因子结构,并在380名大学生的多样化样本中探究了防御机制与宗教应对之间的关系。与DSQ - 40开发者提出的三因素防御模型不同,主轴因子分析得出了两个内部一致的成分:适应性防御方式和 maladaptive防御方式。适应性防御方式的认同与积极宗教应对策略的使用呈正相关,与消极宗教应对呈负相关。Maladaptive防御方式与消极宗教应对策略的认同相关。讨论了这些发现的临床意义,并对DSQ - 40的未来使用提出了建议。