Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States; Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Alcohol. 2019 Dec;81:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
Several studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent to 5 or more standard drinks. Our group has developed Research Rules used to process TAC data in a manner that will detect low-level and moderate drinking even though it is below the AMS criteria for detection.
Sixteen male and 14 female paid research volunteers wore TAC monitors for 28 days in their natural environments and responded daily to text message prompts to self-report the previous day's drinking. Current analyses describe the Research Rules that we developed and how use of those rules impacts the detection of self-reported drinking treated as the standard in sensitivity/specificity analysis.
We observed 606 occurrences of positive TAC events over a total of 867 days and processed the TAC data to retain 345 as possible drinking events, even though AMS criteria confirmed drinking for only 163 of these events. The kinds of TAC events removed or retained by our rules are illustrated as cases of low and moderate drinking days that were detected by our rules but not by the conservative AMS criteria. AMS-confirmed TAC events have a high specificity (99.8%) to detect primarily heavy drinking, but have a poor sensitivity to detect lower-level drinking and a poor specificity as an indicator of alcohol abstinence. In contrast, our Research Rules detected 100% of TAC events detected by AMS but also detected 31% of the lower-level drinking events not detected by AMS, with 91% specificity.
Reliance upon the AMS criteria for alcohol detection affords a high specificity for detection of heavy drinking but is a poor indicator of abstinence rates. In contrast, use of our Research Rules provides more sensitive means to quantify either any drinking or low-moderate levels of drinking while still maintaining good specificity.
有几项研究通过使用酒精监测系统(AMS)的透皮酒精浓度(TAC)设备——SCRAM CAM,客观地量化了饮酒量。AMS 用于检测饮酒的标准被认为是保守的,只能可靠地检测相当于 5 杯或更多标准饮品的重度饮酒。我们的研究小组开发了研究规则,用于以一种能够检测到低水平和中度饮酒的方式处理 TAC 数据,尽管这些数据低于 AMS 的检测标准。
16 名男性和 14 名女性付费研究志愿者在自然环境中佩戴 TAC 监测器 28 天,并每天回复短信提示,报告前一天的饮酒情况。目前的分析描述了我们开发的研究规则,以及这些规则的使用如何影响作为敏感性/特异性分析标准的自我报告饮酒的检测。
我们在总共 867 天中观察到 606 次阳性 TAC 事件,并对 TAC 数据进行处理,保留了 345 次可能的饮酒事件,尽管 AMS 标准仅确认了其中 163 次事件的饮酒情况。我们的规则所保留或排除的 TAC 事件通过案例说明了低水平和中度饮酒日的情况,这些情况是通过我们的规则而不是保守的 AMS 标准检测到的。AMS 确认的 TAC 事件具有很高的特异性(99.8%)来检测主要的重度饮酒,但对低水平饮酒的检测敏感性较低,并且作为酒精戒断的指标特异性较低。相比之下,我们的研究规则检测到了 AMS 检测到的 100%的 TAC 事件,还检测到了 AMS 未检测到的 31%的低水平饮酒事件,特异性为 91%。
依赖 AMS 标准来检测酒精可以高度特异性地检测重度饮酒,但对戒断率的指示性较差。相比之下,使用我们的研究规则可以提供更敏感的方法来量化任何饮酒或低中度饮酒,同时仍然保持良好的特异性。