Koutras Christos, Becker Isabel, Antoniou Stavros A, Heep Hansjoerg
Klinikum Arnsberg, Clinic for Orthopaedics, Nordring 37-41, 59821, Arnsberg, Germany.
University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
J Orthop. 2018 Aug 24;15(4):909-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.025. eCollection 2018 Dec.
To compare two different methods of clinical outcomes prospective documentation after revision hip arthroplasty: external and internal.
Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression analyses were performed.
Eighty one patients experienced a complication (520 arthroplasties). A significant difference was found between the two documentation methods in the variable "hematoma and postoperative hemorrhage", and a significant reduction of the internally and externally documented "total complication rate". Furthermore, the "length of hospital stay" and "duration of operation" predicted independently the occurrence of complications.
Further improvement of documentation methods is required to measure the perioperative morbidity.
比较髋关节翻修术后临床结局前瞻性记录的两种不同方法:外部记录法和内部记录法。
进行卡方检验、费舍尔精确检验和二元逻辑回归分析。
81例患者出现并发症(共520例关节成形术)。在“血肿和术后出血”变量方面,两种记录方法之间存在显著差异,且内部和外部记录的“总并发症率”均显著降低。此外,“住院时间”和“手术时长”可独立预测并发症的发生。
需要进一步改进记录方法以衡量围手术期发病率。