• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械通气患者的驱动压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征。

Driving pressure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients.

机构信息

Department of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

GReD, CNRS UMR 6293, INSERM U1103, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Respirology. 2019 Feb;24(2):137-145. doi: 10.1111/resp.13394. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1111/resp.13394
PMID:30183115
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Elevated driving pressure (ΔP) may be associated with increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients admitted via the emergency department and with post-operative pulmonary complications in surgical patients. This study investigated the association of higher ΔP with the onset of ARDS in a high-risk, intensive care unit (ICU) population.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a prospective multicentre observational study. Data for this ancillary study were obtained from intubated adult patients with at least one ARDS risk factor upon ICU admission enrolled in a previous multicentre observational study. Patients were followed up for the development of ARDS within 7 days (primary outcome). Univariate and multivariate analyses tested the association between ΔP (measured at ICU admission (baseline) or 24 h later (day 1)) and the development of ARDS.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients were included in this study, among whom 34 (15%) developed ARDS within 7 days. These patients had higher baseline ΔP than those who did not (mean ± SD: 12.5 ± 3.1 vs 9.8 ± 3.4 cm H O, respectively, P = 0.0001). The association between baseline ΔP and the risk of developing ARDS was robust to adjustment for baseline tidal volume, positive-end expiratory pressure, illness severity, serum lactate and sepsis, pneumonia, severe trauma and shock as primary ARDS risk factors (odds ratio: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.03-1.41; P = 0.02). The same results were found with day 1 ΔP.

CONCLUSION

Among at-risk ICU patients, higher ΔP may identify those who are more likely to develop ARDS.

摘要

背景与目的

在因急症入住急诊科的患者中,升高的驱动压(ΔP)可能与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)风险增加相关,在接受手术的患者中,与术后肺部并发症相关。本研究旨在调查高危重症监护病房(ICU)人群中较高 ΔP 与 ARDS 发病的关系。

方法

这是一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究的二次分析。该辅助研究的数据来自于先前一项多中心观察性研究中,入住 ICU 时至少存在一个 ARDS 危险因素的成年插管患者。患者在 ICU 入住后 7 天内(主要结局)接受 ARDS 发病的随访。单变量和多变量分析测试了 ICU 入住时(基线)或 24 小时后(第 1 天)测量的 ΔP 与 ARDS 发生之间的关系。

结果

本研究共纳入 221 例患者,其中 34 例(15%)在 7 天内发生 ARDS。这些患者的基线 ΔP 高于未发生 ARDS 的患者(平均±标准差:12.5±3.1 比 9.8±3.4 cmH2O,P=0.0001)。基线 ΔP 与发生 ARDS 的风险之间的关系在调整基线潮气量、呼气末正压、疾病严重程度、血清乳酸和脓毒症、肺炎、严重创伤和休克作为 ARDS 主要危险因素后仍然稳健(比值比:1.20;95%置信区间:1.03-1.41;P=0.02)。第 1 天 ΔP 也得到了相同的结果。

结论

在高危 ICU 患者中,较高的 ΔP 可能识别出更有可能发生 ARDS 的患者。

相似文献

1
Driving pressure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients.机械通气患者的驱动压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
Respirology. 2019 Feb;24(2):137-145. doi: 10.1111/resp.13394. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
2
Epidemiological characteristics, practice of ventilation, and clinical outcome in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units from 16 countries (PRoVENT): an international, multicentre, prospective study.16 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征高危患者的流行病学特征、通气实践和临床转归(PRoVENT):一项国际多中心前瞻性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Nov;4(11):882-893. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30305-8. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Risk factors for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated adults in Peru: a multicenter observational study.秘鲁机械通气成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征发展的危险因素:一项多中心观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 6;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2646-8.
4
Association between ventilatory settings and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients due to brain injury.脑损伤所致机械通气患者的通气设置与急性呼吸窘迫综合征发生之间的关联
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:341-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
5
Association between hospital mortality and inspiratory airway pressures in mechanically ventilated patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective cohort study.机械通气患者无急性呼吸窘迫综合征时吸气气道压力与院内死亡率的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 21;23(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2635-y.
6
Red blood cell transfusions and the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome among the critically ill: a cohort study.危重症患者红细胞输注与急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险:一项队列研究
Crit Care. 2007;11(3):R63. doi: 10.1186/cc5934.
7
[Risk factors of the occurence and death of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective multicenter cohort study].[急性呼吸窘迫综合征发生与死亡的危险因素:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Nov;26(11):773-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.11.002.
8
Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低潮气量与中潮气量策略对无急性呼吸窘迫综合征的 ICU 患者呼吸机使用天数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1872-1880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14280.
9
Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients.机械通气患者中,呼吸机设置作为急性呼吸窘迫综合征的一个危险因素。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul;31(7):922-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2625-1. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
10
Outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in university and non-university hospitals in Germany.德国大学医院和非大学医院急性呼吸窘迫综合征的转归。
Crit Care. 2017 May 30;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1687-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in ARDS: The Role of Driving Pressure and Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中机械通气策略的优化:驱动压和低潮气量通气的作用
Crit Care Res Pract. 2025 Jul 26;2025:8857930. doi: 10.1155/ccrp/8857930. eCollection 2025.
2
Hemodynamic homeostasis disequilibrium in critical illness.危重症中的血流动力学稳态失衡
Front Physiol. 2025 Jul 15;16:1503320. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1503320. eCollection 2025.
3
Driving pressure decoded: Precision strategies in adult respiratory distress syndrome management.
解读驱动压:成人呼吸窘迫综合征管理中的精准策略
World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(2):92441. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92441.
4
Driving pressure in mechanical ventilation: A review.机械通气中的驱动压力:综述
World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 9;13(1):88385. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.88385.
5
Maintenance of low driving pressure in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome significantly affects outcomes.在早期急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中维持较低的驱动压可显著影响结局。
Respir Res. 2021 Dec 15;22(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01912-8.
6
Driving Pressure for Ventilation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者通气的驱动压
Anesthesiology. 2020 Jun;132(6):1569-1576. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003195.
7
Invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.急诊科的有创机械通气
Turk J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 29;19(2):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2019.03.001. eCollection 2019 Apr.
8
Acute respiratory distress syndrome and the promise of driving pressure.急性呼吸窘迫综合征与驱动压的前景
Respirology. 2019 Feb;24(2):95-96. doi: 10.1111/resp.13444. Epub 2018 Nov 22.